Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted, well-structured instruction skill with concrete craft rules, an executable output workflow, and an explicit completion criterion. The main soft spot is a modest amount of metaphorical/analogical prose that could be trimmed for token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean and assumes Claude's intelligence, but includes a few minor trimmable instances such as the geologist/physicist analogies and the framework-ladder sentence ('从社会学掉进心理学...') that go beyond strict instruction. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The output workflow is fully executable (concrete `date` commands, exact file path pattern, org-mode requirement) and the craft rules are concrete directives ('每层有命名—两三个字', '层间有裂缝—每层结尾点出一个问题或矛盾', '终点要狠'), with only minor gaps since the depth path itself is left to judgment ('你自己判断'). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced output workflow (timestamp → write file → org-mode → report path) and an explicit completion/checkpoint criterion ('到底的标志': asking 'why' yields tautology or hits one of four irreducible categories), though no error-recovery feedback loop is present. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A self-contained, short, single-purpose skill with no external references or bundle files, well-organized into clear labeled sections, matching the simple-skill exception where well-organized sections alone justify a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |