Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-structured instruction-only skill body: the drilling method, termination criteria, and output procedure are all concrete, and nothing pads the token budget. It misses the top marks only on actionability and workflow clarity, where a worked example and a directory-existence check before writing would close the gaps.
Suggestions
Add one short worked example (3-layer run on a sample statement showing layer names, the crack question, and the terminal layer) so the layered output format is copy-paste concrete rather than described.
Prepend a directory check to the output steps (e.g., `mkdir -p ~/Documents/notes` before writing the timestamped file) so step 4 cannot fail on a missing path.
Include a minimal org-mode skeleton for the output file, since the body mandates org syntax but shows no org structure to follow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with zero padding: no concept explanations Claude would already know, no background, and every section (钻的逻辑, 怎么钻, 什么算到底, 怎么写, 输出) carries instruction. The persona metaphors are brief and functional (they define output tone), so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance is present throughout: three named rules, an explicit domain-ladder ('从社会学掉进心理学...从数学掉进逻辑本身'), four terminal categories with a termination test, and exact output commands (`date +%Y%m%dT%H%M%S`) plus a file path template. It falls short of anchor 5 only because there is no worked example of a layered output or a sample org-mode file to copy from. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is coherent and well-ordered: drilling method → termination criteria → writing style → numbered output procedure with exact commands. Not a destructive or batch operation, so no validation cap applies; the gap that keeps it below 5 is that it never ensures `~/Documents/notes/` exists before writing, nor verifies the file was written before reporting the path. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a short, single-purpose skill with no external references needed; no bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/) exist. Sections are clearly headed and each addresses one concern, which per the rubric's simple-skill guidance earns a 5 on well-organized structure alone. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |