Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-organized and its output mechanics are genuinely executable, but the core drilling method leans on metaphor and atmospheric framing rather than a tight, fully operationalized procedure. The end-to-end workflow is implied rather than unified, which caps workflow clarity below the top level.
Suggestions
Tighten or relocate the poetic preamble (你是什么 / 钻的逻辑): keep one concise framing line and move the rest of the token budget into the operational method.
Operationalize '怎么钻': replace '脚下的地面' metaphor with an explicit per-layer procedure (e.g., state the current assumption, ask 'why is this true?', restate the deeper frame) so the method is repeatable.
Add a brief unified end-to-end sequence (drill each layer → apply 到底 check → write notes → report path) so the implicit workflow becomes one explicit, checkpointed flow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and does not lecture on concepts Claude already knows, but the atmospheric preamble ('一支离弦之箭...') and analogies (地质学家/物理学家) add tokens that don't directly advance execution. Not a 1 because there is no generic padding; not a 3 because not every token earns its place. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready output steps ('date +%Y%m%dT%H%M%S', the notes path, org-mode, no markdown) and specific writing rules (每层有命名, 层间有裂缝) are present, but the core method '找到当前这层脚下的地面，然后钻进那个地面' is metaphorical rather than a fully operationalized procedure. Solid guidance with some abstraction remaining. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear termination criterion ('到底的标志') and a clean 4-step output sequence are present, but the end-to-end flow (drill → check bottom → write) is implied across sections rather than presented as one checkpointed sequence. Not a 1 because stopping criteria and ordered output steps exist; not a 3 because the overall workflow isn't unified with explicit feedback checkpoints. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-purpose thinking skill with no external references and no bundle files, organized into clear, well-delimited sections (怎么钻 / 什么算到底 / 怎么写 / 输出). Per the simple-skill carve-out, well-organized sections with no need for external references score 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |