Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, high-judgment body: executable commands for the main loop, debugging heuristics that are all non-obvious, a redirect table for when to use other tools, and deliberate non-duplication of `--help`. The only gap is a missing verification step that the debugger actually started before sending turns.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every sentence carries non-obvious domain knowledge (cost per turn, stale-code restart hazard, log lines interleaved under their turn) and nothing explains concepts Claude already knows. 'The help is thorough and is the source of truth for subcommands and flags, so this skill doesn't restate them' is exactly the right token economy. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The core loop is copy-paste ready ('lk agent debugger start', 'lk agent debugger say "Hi, what can you do?"', 'lk agent debugger stop') and covers the common cases; withholding exact subcommand flags is explicitly justified as version-stability ('Check `--help` for the current format instead of assuming field names'). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | 'Start the agent, say user turns, inspect what happened, edit the code, restart' is a clear sequenced loop with a preflight check (confirm the command exists) and a reproduce-then-rerun feedback loop, but there is no explicit checkpoint that 'start' actually succeeded or what to do when a command itself errors — anchor 4's 'minor validation gaps' fits better than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the ~75-line body is appropriately self-contained: well-organized sections (The loop, Debugging with it, When to use something else, Related skills), with detail delegated one level deep to `--help` and clearly named sibling skills in a decision table. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |