Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence with no padding or explanation of known concepts; minor redundancy between Workflow step 6 and the Guardrails list of unsupported fields keeps it just below fully efficient.

Actionability

Concrete, specific guidance is provided via a numbered workflow and an explicit output-format template with named table columns; it stops short of a fully worked example output, leaving a minor gap.

Workflow Clarity

A clear 7-step sequence is paired with a Quality check verification checklist; because this is a non-destructive assembly task the batch/destructive cap does not apply, but there is no explicit validate-fix-retry feedback loop.

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized into clearly labeled sections (Purpose, Inputs, Workflow, Output, Guardrails, Quality check) with no nested references; at ~64 lines with no external files needed it is well-structured but just outside the under-50-line simple-skill exception.

Specificity

Names the domain ('evidence-backed account and contact brief') and the single action of assembling from records and research, matching the '1-2 concrete actions but not comprehensive' anchor; it does not list multiple distinct actions.

Completeness

Both 'what' (assembling an evidence-backed account and contact brief) and 'when' (Use when...) are present, but the when clause largely restates the what rather than offering distinct, specific trigger phrases, fitting 'both present, when could be more specific'.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms a user would say ('account', 'contact brief', 'records', 'research') with a clear 'Use when' trigger; a few common synonyms or variations are missing, so it sits above the midpoint rather than at comprehensive coverage.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche (evidence-backed account/contact brief from supplied records and dated research) is specific with distinct triggers and minimal overlap with other skills.