Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, actionable instruction skill with concrete rules, statuses, and an output template. The only minor gap is the absence of an explicit error-recovery feedback loop, though the task does not demand one.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-sectioned with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (Purpose, Required inputs, Workflow, Output format, Guardrails, Quality check) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable: exact statuses (Fact/Hypothesis/Missing), exact functions (Buyer/User/Champion/Blocker), explicit fact-vs-hypothesis rules, and a copy-paste output table template. Absence of code is appropriate for this instruction-only skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence is paired with a "Quality check" validation checkpoint, but there is no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop; this is an analytical (non-destructive) task so the destructive cap does not apply, leaving it just below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references and no bundle files present, the body is well-organized into clear sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception for the top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |