Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality skill body: dense, example-driven, with a complete executable scaffold, a clear page-assembly sequence, and a concrete review checklist that doubles as validation. The main gaps are the placeholder BentoGrid interior and the absence of local reference files for per-component and copy-rule detail, which currently leans on external documentation URLs.
Suggestions
Add one minimal BentoCard/CodeShowcase/FeatureGrid snippet (or a local reference file with one tile example each) so the placeholder '{/* BentoGrid of live tiles */}' can be replaced without consulting external docs.
Move the detailed 'AgentSkillCard content' and 'Copy and content rules' sections into a local reference file (e.g. references/copy-rules.md) linked from the body, keeping SKILL.md as a tighter overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and instructive throughout: a component table ("Wrap every middle band in it", "colSpan/rowSpan for emphasis"), terse copy rules ("one sentence, under 20 words, concrete... never 'powerful', 'seamless' or 'next-generation'"), and executable TSX with no padding. It never explains concepts Claude already knows (React, routing, CSS variables), matching the 5-anchor "every token earns its place" rather than 4, where over-explanation would still be present. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The main scaffold is copy-paste ready (full LandingHero/LandingSection/InstallBanner TSX and a complete renderLink implementation with "pass one shared renderLink so internal links use the router"), plus concrete limits like "at most two hero actions" and "give the most expressive component colSpan={2} rowSpan={2}". It falls short of 5 because BentoGrid, CodeShowcase, and FeatureGrid appear only as table rows and the scaffold leaves "{/* BentoGrid of live tiles */}" as a placeholder, deferring those props to external doc URLs. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The build sequence is explicit and numbered ("Default order... 1. LandingHero... 5. InstallBanner" with "Drop a band rather than filling it with filler"), wiring steps follow, and the "Review checklist" provides explicit validation checkpoints ("Every link resolves", "At 375px wide the hero stacks", "Nothing animates under prefers-reduced-motion"). This matches the 5-anchor's checklist-for-complex-processes criterion; no destructive or batch operations exist that would require a fix-and-retry loop or impose the cap at 3. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good: a component table, clear section headers, and a well-signaled one-level-deep delegation ("Read each one's page before using a prop you have not seen here: https://ui.lobehub.com/skills/components/awesome/<kebab-name>.md") that externalizes per-component prop detail. It is not 5 because the ~150-line body inlines detailed sections (AgentSkillCard content rules, full copy rules) that could live in local reference files, and navigation relies on external URLs rather than a bundled, discoverable reference set — matching the 4-anchor ("good structure; minor organization gaps") over the 3-anchor, since references are clearly signaled and nothing is buried. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |