Content
37%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This SKILL.md is essentially a well-organized table of contents with no substantive content of its own. While the progressive disclosure structure is sound in theory, the complete absence of any actionable guidance, code examples, quick-start patterns, or workflow descriptions means Claude would gain almost nothing from this file alone. The skill desperately needs either inline content (at minimum a quick-start section with key patterns) or the actual bundle reference files to have any value.
Suggestions
Add a 'Quick Start' or 'Key Patterns' section with 3-5 concrete, executable code examples showing the most important 37signals conventions (e.g., thin controller pattern, model concern pattern, Turbo Frame usage).
Include a brief workflow or decision tree: 'When building a new feature, consult these references in order: 1) routing → 2) controllers → 3) models → 4) views → 5) testing'.
Add at least a summary of the most critical anti-patterns or 'what they avoid' inline, so Claude has actionable constraints even without loading reference files.
Provide the actual bundle reference files, or at minimum include substantive inline content for the top 3-5 most commonly needed reference areas.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is extremely lean — it's essentially a topic map with brief descriptors for each reference file. No unnecessary explanations, no padding, no concepts Claude already knows. Every line serves as navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The SKILL.md contains zero concrete code, commands, examples, or executable guidance. It is purely a table of contents pointing to reference files. Without those reference files being available, there is nothing actionable here — no patterns, no code snippets, no specific instructions Claude can follow. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | There are no workflows, sequences, or processes described. The content is a flat list of references with no guidance on when to consult which file, no decision trees, and no validation steps. For a skill covering controllers, models, testing, and multi-step processes, the complete absence of any workflow guidance is a significant gap. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The structure is well-organized with clear categories and one-level-deep references, which is good progressive disclosure design. However, since no bundle files were provided, none of the 30+ referenced files actually exist, making this an empty shell. The navigation is clearly signaled but leads nowhere verifiable. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |