executing-plans

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/executing-plans/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, well-structured execution skill with concrete steps, explicit validation checkpoints, and clear cross-references to required workflow skills. Its main limitation is that verification detail is delegated to the plan rather than specified inline.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and assumes competence; the only redundancy is the 'Remember' section restating the process, which keeps it just below a 5.	4 / 5
Actionability	Concrete, executable guidance (TodoWrite, mark in_progress, run verifications, named required sub-skills) with only minor gaps, suitable for an instruction-only skill.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clearly sequenced three-step process with explicit stop conditions and an ask-don't-guess feedback loop; the actual verification specifics are deferred to the plan rather than defined here.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Well-organized sections with related skills clearly signaled in the Integration section; no bundle files are needed, but it slightly exceeds the simple-skill line count so it does not reach 5.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, third-person description with an explicit trigger clause that distinguishes it from generic planning skills. It is somewhat thin on enumerated capabilities and trigger synonyms, which keeps it solidly mid-to-upper rather than exemplary.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain and a couple of concrete actions ('execute in a separate session', 'review checkpoints'), but the action list is not comprehensive enough for a 4.	3 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what (execute a plan with review checkpoints) and when ('Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute'); the when is concrete but not maximally specific.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural terms a user would say ('implementation plan', 'execute'), but lacks common synonyms or variations that would push it to 4.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The 'separate session with review checkpoints' framing carves a clear niche with minor overlap risk against related planning skills, not the minimal conflict risk of a 5.	4 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: lucianghinda/superpowers-ruby
Path: skills/executing-plans/SKILL.md
Commit: 99fac3d

Reviewed: 5 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.