Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable interactive-skill body with clear sequencing, validation via acceptance criteria, and appropriately externalized bulk content. The main improvement is trimming repeated emphasis and the redundant closing example.
Suggestions
Collapse the repeated 'IMPORTANT'/'CRITICAL' shuffle reminders into a single guardrail statement to reduce token cost.
Remove or shorten the trailing 'Example: for a 7/10 after run on Hooks' block since the Acceptance Criteria already specify the expected output.
Provide a concrete AskUserQuestion invocation skeleton once so each round can reuse it instead of re-describing headers and options inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean for a multi-step interactive skill and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but repeats emphasis ('IMPORTANT', 'CRITICAL') and includes a trailing illustrative example that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance — an exact lesson mapping table, literal AskUserQuestion option strings, and a shuffle example — with only minor gaps such as the full AskUserQuestion invocation payload not being templated. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-6 are clearly sequenced, an Acceptance Criteria checklist acts as explicit validation before final output, and the Edge Cases section supplies error-recovery feedback loops (invalid arg, quit mid-quiz, missing README, empty bank). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that cleanly externalizes bulk material to one-level-deep, clearly signaled references — references/question-bank.md (~51KB) and references/results-template.md — both confirmed to exist, with no nested reference chains. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |