Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable core skill with strong workflow checkpoints and clean progressive disclosure. Its main weakness is redundancy: several key facts (the search→get rule, action and SDK lists) are repeated across sections, inflating token cost without adding clarity.
Suggestions
Consolidate the "search"→"get" guidance into one canonical location (e.g. references/api-actions.md or Common Mistakes) and cross-reference it elsewhere instead of restating it ~5 times.
Merge the duplicate valid-action lists (the API Architecture ASCII table and the "Valid Actions" section) into a single authoritative list.
Collapse the three SDK enumerations (SDK Selection, Backend SDKs table, Frontend SDKs table) into one combined table, leaving install details to references/sdk-setup.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Content is Luzmo-specific and not padded with concepts Claude already knows, but the same facts recur repeatedly — the "search"→"get" mistake appears ~5 times and the valid-action and SDK lists are each restated in multiple sections. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides executable code blocks (createAuthorization, embed-dashboard, SDK calls, request bodies), concrete documentation URLs, and explicit SDK package tables — copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Security Checkpoint is an explicit validation hard-stop with checkboxes and a "STOP and fix before proceeding" feedback loop, and the documentation discovery fallback is a clearly numbered 4-step sequence. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A dedicated "Bundled References" section lists seven one-line-described reference files (all verified present in ./references/), each flagged "read only when relevant", with inline pointers — one level deep and well-signaled. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |