Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured navigation skill: clear core rule, a task-to-doc lookup table, and mistake-triggered doc pointers that make the workflow easy to follow. The main weaknesses are redundancy across the Overview/Core Rule/Red Flags sections and a slightly under-specified fallback search step.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated core rule: keep the single bolded 'MUST ALWAYS read the relevant API docs BEFORE writing or editing Lynx code' statement in one section and cut the near-duplicate sentences in 'Overview' and 'Red Flags'.
Merge 'Why Web Knowledge Fails' and 'Red Flags — Stop and Read Docs' into one section; each currently restates the same facts (div/span vs view/text, box-sizing auto, no margin collapsing) with the same doc pointers.
Replace 'If uncertain, search the elements/ or css/ directories' with a concrete search step (e.g., the specific grep/Glob pattern to run against the installed docs directory), and drop the four inlined 'Core Rules' bullets in favor of the pointer to quick-reference.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and does not teach concepts Claude already knows (Lynx platform differences are legitimately unfamiliar), but the same facts are repeated across sections — the core rule appears in 'Overview' ('Always retrieve from the installed API docs before writing or modifying Lynx page code'), 'Core Rule' ('MUST ALWAYS read the relevant API docs BEFORE writing or editing any Lynx code'), and again in 'Red Flags'; box-sizing ('auto, normally with border-box sizing') and margin collapsing each appear twice. This is more than the 'minor instances that could be trimmed' of the level-4 anchor, but well short of heavily padded. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The Quick Reference table maps each task to concrete, specific doc paths ('css/supported-properties.md', 'layout/linear-layout.md') and the Red Flags pair each mistake with the exact doc to read, which is concrete executable guidance for an instruction-only skill. The gap keeping it from 5: the fallback 'If uncertain, search the elements/ or css/ directories' gives no concrete search mechanism (e.g., a grep/Glob invocation), and the referenced paths cannot be verified as real files since no bundle directory exists alongside SKILL.md. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | 'How to Use the Docs' gives a clear 5-step sequence (identify task, look up file, read before editing, apply, fallback search) with an explicit ordering checkpoint ('Read the doc BEFORE writing or editing code'). This is a read-then-apply documentation skill, not a destructive or batch operation, so the missing-validate cap does not apply; the only minor gap is that there is no verification step after applying doc rules (e.g., re-checking the doc when output looks wrong), which fits the level-4 anchor rather than the explicit-feedback-loops of level 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a genuine overview that points to one-level-deep, well-signaled references via the Quick Reference table, and the Red Flags section routes to specific docs — good structure matching level 4. It falls short of level 5 because the 'Core Rules' section inlines four rules ('Text must use <text> component', 'No margin collapsing', 'Use rem + vw') that duplicate the very content it says lives in 'quick-reference.md', a minor organization gap; also, no bundle files are present to verify the referenced paths resolve. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |