CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

using-lynx-api-docs

Provides authoritative guidance for Lynx development involving pages, templates, components, CSS, layouts, elements, web migration, rendering or styling bugs, and code review. Applies to *.ttml, Lynx *.tsx, and all Lynx-specific files, and requires searching the installed API docs before acting.

62

Quality

72%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./ai/skills/lynx-api-docs/skills/using-lynx-api-docs/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is well-organized, actionable, and uses a clear task-to-file lookup table plus a red-flags checklist to guide behavior, with good progressive disclosure via one-level-deep doc references. The main weakness is mild repetition of the core directive and inability to verify referenced files since no bundle directory exists.

Suggestions

Consolidate the repeated 'read docs before writing code' directive so it appears once prominently, removing redundant restatements across Overview, Core Rule, How to Use, and Red Flags.

Provide a single concrete code contrast example (e.g., a 2-line web snippet vs. the correct Lynx equivalent) to make the migration/red-flag guidance immediately executable.

Confirm the referenced doc files (layout/linear-layout.md, css/supported-properties.md, etc.) actually exist in a bundle directory, or note that the docs are installed externally, so the references are verifiable rather than aspirational.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence, but repeats the core directive ('read docs before writing code') several times across Overview, Core Rule, How to Use, and Red Flags, which could be tightened.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, actionable guidance: a task-to-file lookup table, specific element and property examples, and a red-flags checklist; minor gaps in that no code snippets are shown, but this is an instruction/reference skill so the absence is acceptable.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The 'How to Use the Docs' section gives a clear 5-step numbered sequence for the core task, and the Red Flags act as checkpoints; no destructive/batch operation requires an explicit validate->retry loop, so the 3-cap does not apply.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-structured overview with a clear Quick Reference table pointing one level deep to organized doc paths (layout/, css/, elements/, patterns/); no bundle files exist on disk to verify, but the referenced paths are clearly signaled and grouped by task.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and well-scoped to a clear Lynx niche with good trigger file types, but it omits an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, leaving the 'when' only weakly implied and capping completeness.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when ...' trigger clause naming the natural situations and phrases that should activate this skill (e.g., 'Use when writing or debugging Lynx pages, components, or styles, or migrating web code to Lynx').

Include a few user-natural synonyms alongside the technical terms (e.g., 'Lynx UI', 'Lynx styling', 'cross-platform rendering') to broaden trigger coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions (pages, templates, components, CSS, layouts, elements, web migration, rendering/styling bugs, code review) with comprehensive domain coverage.

5 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clearly stated, but there is no explicit 'Use when...' clause; the trigger guidance is only weakly implied by the enumeration of applicable tasks and file types, capping completeness at 3 per the rubric.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms like 'pages', 'templates', 'components', 'layouts', 'web migration', and file extensions (*.ttml, *.tsx), but lacks common synonyms a user might say and the language is somewhat dense.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The Lynx-specific scope (*.ttml, Lynx *.tsx, installed API docs) gives it a clear niche with minimal conflict risk, though the broad task list slightly raises overlap with generic frontend skills.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
lynx-family/lynx
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.