CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

000-jeremy-content-consistency-validator

Validate messaging consistency across website, GitHub repos, and local documentation generating read-only discrepancy reports. Use when checking content alignment or finding mixed messaging. Trigger with phrases like "check consistency", "validate documentation", or "audit messaging".

74

1.17x

Quality

56%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

86%

1.17x

Average score across 6 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./data/000-jeremy-content-consistency-validator/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Evaluation results

83%

32%

Pre-Update Documentation Consistency Audit

Report structure and severity classification

Criteria
Without context
With context

Report file saved

0%

0%

Timestamped filename

0%

0%

Executive Summary

50%

100%

Website vs GitHub section

0%

100%

Website vs Local Docs section

0%

100%

GitHub vs Local Docs section

0%

100%

Action Items section

87%

100%

Severity labels used

100%

100%

Website as source of truth

50%

80%

Exact text quoted

100%

100%

File locations cited

100%

100%

No files modified

100%

100%

Without context: $0.3551 · 2m 29s · 17 turns · 18 in / 6,000 out tokens

With context: $0.5332 · 2m 58s · 24 turns · 24 in / 7,497 out tokens

96%

10%

Terminology Consistency Audit

Terminology table and content extraction

Criteria
Without context
With context

Terminology table present

100%

100%

Table columns correct

100%

83%

Plugin vs extension captured

100%

100%

Marketplace vs repository captured

100%

100%

Version numbers extracted

100%

100%

Contact info extracted

100%

100%

Feature descriptions compared

75%

100%

Timestamped report file

0%

100%

Terminal summary present

100%

100%

No source files altered

100%

100%

Website as authority

66%

66%

Without context: $0.3886 · 3m 13s · 17 turns · 18 in / 6,951 out tokens

With context: $0.6280 · 3m 51s · 31 turns · 1,026 in / 8,974 out tokens

83%

13%

Post-Redesign Documentation Alignment Check

Website framework detection and workflow phases

Criteria
Without context
With context

Next.js source identified

100%

100%

claudes-docs scanned

100%

100%

Phase 1 evidence

50%

75%

Phase 2 evidence

12%

50%

Phase 3 evidence

37%

87%

Phase 4 evidence

75%

100%

Line numbers cited

70%

100%

Exact source text

100%

100%

No input files modified

100%

80%

Severity classification

90%

100%

Report saved to consistency-reports

0%

0%

Without context: $0.2575 · 1m 46s · 11 turns · 12 in / 4,655 out tokens

With context: $0.8779 · 4m 53s · 34 turns · 1,536 in / 13,440 out tokens

82%

8%

Pre-Blog-Post Content Audit

Gatsby site detection and contact info validation

Criteria
Without context
With context

Gatsby public/ identified

0%

0%

Contact email extracted

100%

100%

Contact info discrepancy classified Critical

100%

100%

Broken cross-reference identified

100%

100%

Broken cross-reference classified Critical

100%

100%

Exact contact text quoted

100%

100%

File locations cited

100%

100%

Action items recommend website as authority

100%

100%

Timestamped report file

0%

0%

Executive summary present

62%

100%

Three severity levels used

28%

100%

No input files modified

100%

100%

Without context: $0.2177 · 1m 47s · 9 turns · 10 in / 4,806 out tokens

With context: $0.8062 · 4m 46s · 36 turns · 984 in / 12,157 out tokens

91%

4%

Pre-Release Documentation Alignment Check

Docusaurus site detection and technical spec comparison

Criteria
Without context
With context

Docusaurus build/ identified

70%

70%

CONTRIBUTING.md scanned

100%

100%

Technical specs extracted

100%

100%

Requirement conflict as Critical

90%

100%

Version numbers compared

100%

100%

Update flow direction correct

100%

100%

Exact requirement text quoted

87%

100%

File locations cited

100%

100%

Severity labels present

100%

100%

Timestamped report saved

0%

25%

No input files modified

100%

100%

Action items with file references

100%

100%

Without context: $0.2212 · 1m 41s · 8 turns · 9 in / 4,942 out tokens

With context: $0.5387 · 2m 55s · 23 turns · 506 in / 8,344 out tokens

86%

12%

Post-Rebrand Content Consistency Audit

11ty site detection and post-rebrand terminology alignment

Criteria
Without context
With context

11ty _site/ identified

0%

0%

Contact info extracted from all sources

100%

100%

Contact info discrepancy identified

100%

100%

Contact mismatch classified Critical

66%

100%

Terminology inconsistency identified

100%

100%

Terminology classified Warning or Critical

75%

100%

Website as rebrand authority

100%

100%

Exact text quoted

100%

100%

File locations cited

100%

100%

All three severity levels used

62%

50%

Timestamped report saved

0%

100%

No input files modified

100%

100%

Without context: $0.2041 · 1m 40s · 9 turns · 10 in / 4,292 out tokens

With context: $0.3103 · 2m 10s · 15 turns · 709 in / 5,512 out tokens

Repository
majiayu000/claude-skill-registry-data
Evaluated
Agent
Claude Code
Model
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.