Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and gives executable commands for the core workflow, but it is undermined by dangling references: cited scripts are not bundled and a referenced subsection is absent.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced `scripts/init-artifact.sh` and `scripts/bundle-artifact.sh` in a scripts/ bundle, or remove the script invocations in favor of inline commands.
Add the missing 'Common Development Tasks' section that Step 2 directs the reader to, or drop the forward reference.
Add a brief verification checkpoint after bundling (e.g., confirm `bundle.html` exists and opens) to strengthen the workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean with concrete commands and a compact stack line; the emoji checkmark list and a few explanatory asides (e.g., the testing-latency note) could be trimmed but are not severely padded. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands (`bash scripts/init-artifact.sh <project-name>`, `bash scripts/bundle-artifact.sh`) and explains what the bundle step does, but Step 2 points to a 'Common Development Tasks' section that does not exist in the body. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (init → develop → bundle → display → optional test) is presented up front and expanded per step; no explicit verification that bundle.html was produced, but the operation is not destructive/batch so the validation cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section structure is reasonable, but the body references `scripts/init-artifact.sh` and `scripts/bundle-artifact.sh` while no scripts/ bundle exists, and Step 2 cites a missing 'Common Development Tasks' section — references that do not resolve. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |