CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

cto-advisor

Technical leadership guidance for engineering teams, architecture decisions, and technology strategy. Includes tech debt analyzer, team scaling calculator, engineering metrics frameworks, technology evaluation tools, and ADR templates. Use when assessing technical debt, scaling engineering teams, evaluating technologies, making architecture decisions, establishing engineering metrics, or when user mentions CTO, tech debt, technical debt, team scaling, architecture decisions, technology evaluation, engineering metrics, DORA metrics, or technology strategy.

Install with Tessl CLI

npx tessl i github:majiayu000/claude-skill-registry-data --skill cto-advisor
What are skills?

83

1.73x

Quality

75%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

99%

1.73x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./c-level/cto-advisor/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Review
Evals

Evaluation results

100%

47%

Technical Debt Assessment for RapidCart Platform

Technical debt assessment and remediation planning

Criteria
Without context
With context

Uses analyzer script

65%

100%

Critical capacity: 40%

0%

100%

High capacity: 25%

0%

100%

Medium capacity: 15%

0%

100%

Low debt: ongoing

0%

100%

Debt score in report

100%

100%

Category breakdown

100%

100%

Prioritized actions

100%

100%

Strategic recommendations

100%

100%

Risk assessment present

100%

100%

Without context: $0.7324 · 3m 18s · 26 turns · 267 in / 11,797 out tokens

With context: $0.7519 · 2m 22s · 27 turns · 75 in / 7,789 out tokens

100%

50%

Database Selection for Microservices Migration

Technology evaluation and ADR documentation

Criteria
Without context
With context

ADR file path

40%

100%

ADR status field

100%

100%

Context and problem

100%

100%

All 3 options included

100%

100%

Pros and cons per option

60%

100%

Decision rationale

100%

100%

Consequences documented

100%

100%

Technical criteria: 40% weight

0%

100%

Business criteria: 30% weight

0%

100%

Operational criteria: 30% weight

0%

100%

Decision drivers listed

100%

100%

Without context: $0.4077 · 2m 30s · 12 turns · 61 in / 8,093 out tokens

With context: $0.7565 · 3m 16s · 24 turns · 71 in / 10,314 out tokens

98%

36%

Engineering Scaling Plan for Series B Expansion

Team scaling and engineering metrics planning

Criteria
Without context
With context

Uses scaling calculator

20%

100%

Manager:Engineer ratio 1:8

80%

100%

Seniority ratio 3:4:2

0%

100%

Deployment frequency target

100%

75%

Lead time target

100%

100%

MTTR target

100%

100%

Change failure rate target

100%

100%

Test coverage target

100%

100%

Unplanned work target

0%

100%

On-call incidents target

0%

100%

Quarterly hiring timeline

100%

100%

Scaling risks

100%

100%

Without context: $0.7801 · 3m 38s · 26 turns · 121 in / 13,442 out tokens

With context: $1.5052 · 4m 12s · 48 turns · 92 in / 14,263 out tokens

Evaluated
Agent
Claude Code
Model
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.