Content
43%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized reference catalog of Git workflow modules, but it re-explains well-known Conventional Commit types, lacks executable commands beyond the commit example, presents no sequenced workflow with validation, and references a missing AGENTS.md file.
Suggestions
Trim the standard Conventional Commit type definitions (Claude already knows them) and keep only the project-specific convention and a couple of examples.
Add a concrete sequenced workflow (e.g. stage → write Conventional Commit → push → open PR/MR) with a validation checkpoint such as confirming the message format or running a pre-commit check.
Provide executable commands for the platform/CI sections (e.g. example GitHub Actions workflow, Gitee Go pipeline) instead of one-line feature descriptions, and either create the referenced AGENTS.md or remove the dangling link.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body re-lists standard Conventional Commit types (feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, chore) with definitions that Claude already knows, which is unnecessary explanation, though the rest is compact and well-organized, placing it just above the verbose anchors but not fully efficient. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The commit format `<type>(<scope>): <description>` and example `feat(auth): add google oauth2 login support` are concrete, but the branching, platform, and MCP sections are descriptive ("CI/CD 首选", "静态网站托管") with no executable commands or steps, leaving key details missing. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The content is a topical catalog rather than a sequenced process; there is no commit/push/review workflow with ordered steps, and no validation checkpoints for the potentially destructive git operations, fitting the rough-or-absent-sequence anchor rather than the listed-steps anchor. | 2 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are clearly organized, but the body references [AGENTS.md](AGENTS.md) which is not present in any bundle directory (a dangling reference), and MCP/agent details are inlined that could live in separate files, so structure is present but references are not cleanly signaled or backed by real files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 11 / 20 Passed |