Technical research methodology with YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles. Phases: scope definition, information gathering, analysis, synthesis, recommendation. Capabilities: technology evaluation, architecture analysis, best practices research, trade-off assessment, solution design. Actions: research, analyze, evaluate, compare, recommend technical solutions. Keywords: research, technology evaluation, best practices, architecture analysis, trade-offs, scalability, security, maintainability, YAGNI, KISS, DRY, technical analysis, solution design, competitive analysis, feasibility study. Use when: researching technologies, evaluating architectures, analyzing best practices, comparing solutions, assessing technical trade-offs, planning scalable/secure systems.
77
71%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
80%
2.05xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./skills/data/0-research/SKILL.mdLow
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
This skill's "Search Strategy" and "Deep Content Analysis" steps explicitly instruct the agent to run gemini or WebSearch and to use docs-seeker to fetch and read public web pages and GitHub README/changelogs (e.g., "Check if `gemini`... fallback to `WebSearch`" and "When you found a potential Github repository URL, use `docs-seeker`"), meaning untrusted third‑party content is ingested and interpreted and can materially influence the agent's actions.
04324c6
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.