scope

Turn ideas into clear, buildable specs for AI tools or stakeholder review. Use when starting features, planning projects, or when AI keeps building the wrong thing. Creates Quick Feature Specs (10-15 min) for immediate AI builds or Full Project Scopes (1-2 hours) for budget planning and contractor estimates.

2.51x

Quality

—

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

88%

2.51x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is actionable with solid templates and sequenced checklists, but it is somewhat long and its two referenced companion files do not exist in the bundle, leaving the progressive-disclosure structure incomplete. Adding verification checkpoints would tighten the workflow.

Suggestions

Provide the missing QUICK-SPEC.md and PROJECT-SCOPE.md bundle files referenced in the body so the progressive-disclosure structure is complete and links resolve.

Move the full Quick Feature Spec and Project Scope templates/section detail out of SKILL.md into the referenced files, keeping SKILL.md a lean overview that points to them.

Add an explicit validation/done-checkpoint to each workflow (e.g., 'Before handing off: confirm every checklist item is filled and out-of-scope is stated') to raise workflow clarity.

Trim repeated 'see ...' pointers and consolidate the Success Looks Like / When You're Stuck sections to reduce token redundancy.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly efficient with checklists and templates, but at ~177 lines it repeats the 'see QUICK-SPEC.md / PROJECT-SCOPE.md' pointers several times and includes value-add but non-essential sections (Success Looks Like, When You're Stuck) that could be trimmed.	2 / 3
Actionability	Concrete, copy-paste-ready templates ('Users can [ACTION] to [OUTCOME]'), step checklists, a save path ('docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-feature-name.md'), and a ready AI prompt ('Build this feature: [paste Quick Feature Spec]') give fully executable guidance for an instruction-only skill.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Workflows are clearly sequenced with progress checklists and a numbered 7-section list, but there is no explicit validation/done-checkpoint confirming the spec is complete and correct before use.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	References are clearly signaled one level deep ('See QUICK-SPEC.md', 'See PROJECT-SCOPE.md'), but those referenced files are absent from the bundle (dangling links) and substantial template detail is inlined in SKILL.md that arguably belongs in those separate files.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it states concrete deliverables, gives explicit natural-language triggers covering what and when, and occupies a distinctive niche. It follows the good-example pattern of action list plus 'Use when' clause.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names multiple concrete actions and outputs — 'Creates Quick Feature Specs (10-15 min)' and 'Full Project Scopes (1-2 hours)' — going beyond a single domain action, matching the multiple-specific-actions anchor.	3 / 3
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ('Creates Quick Feature Specs... Full Project Scopes') and when ('Use when starting features...'), with an explicit 'Use when' trigger clause.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	'Use when starting features, planning projects, or when AI keeps building the wrong thing' provides good coverage of natural phrases a user would say, matching the natural-terms anchor.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	A clear niche (specs for AI tools or stakeholder review) with two distinct deliverable types and distinctive triggers makes conflict with other skills unlikely.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
relative_links	Relative link issues: 4 missing	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
Commit: 8271354

Reviewed: about 16 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.