scope
Turn ideas into clear, buildable specs for AI tools or stakeholder review. Use when starting features, planning projects, or when AI keeps building the wrong thing. Creates Quick Feature Specs (10-15 min) for immediate AI builds or Full Project Scopes (1-2 hours) for budget planning and contractor estimates.
88
85%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
88%
2.51xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong description that clearly communicates what the skill does (creates two types of specs with specific time estimates), when to use it (starting features, planning projects, AI building wrong things), and for whom (AI tools, stakeholders, contractors). It uses third person voice correctly, includes natural trigger terms, and is concise without being vague.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple concrete actions and outputs: 'Turn ideas into clear, buildable specs', 'Creates Quick Feature Specs (10-15 min) for immediate AI builds' and 'Full Project Scopes (1-2 hours) for budget planning and contractor estimates.' These are specific deliverables with time estimates and purposes. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Turn ideas into clear, buildable specs', 'Creates Quick Feature Specs... or Full Project Scopes') and when ('Use when starting features, planning projects, or when AI keeps building the wrong thing'). The 'Use when...' clause is explicit and covers multiple trigger scenarios. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong natural trigger terms users would say: 'specs', 'features', 'planning projects', 'AI keeps building the wrong thing', 'budget planning', 'contractor estimates', 'starting features'. These cover multiple natural phrasings a user might employ. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Occupies a clear niche around spec writing and project scoping specifically for AI tool development and stakeholder review. The mention of two distinct output types (Quick Feature Specs vs Full Project Scopes) and the unique trigger 'AI keeps building the wrong thing' make it highly distinguishable from generic planning or documentation skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is well-structured with strong progressive disclosure and clear workflows, making it easy to navigate between quick and full spec approaches. However, it includes motivational/advisory content ('When You're Stuck', 'Success Looks Like', 'Common Mistakes') that pads the token budget without adding actionable value for Claude. The actionability could be improved with more concrete, complete examples rather than partial templates.
Suggestions
Remove or significantly trim the 'When You're Stuck', 'Success Looks Like', and 'Common Mistakes' sections — these are human-facing advice that Claude doesn't need.
Add a complete, filled-out Quick Feature Spec example (not just template fragments) so Claude can see the expected output end-to-end.
Trim the 'When to Use This Skill' section since Claude can infer appropriate usage from the skill description and content.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Generally efficient but includes some unnecessary sections like 'When You're Stuck' advice, 'Success Looks Like' motivational checklist, and 'Common Mistakes' table that explain things Claude already understands. The 'When to Use This Skill' section is also somewhat redundant with the description. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides templates and checklists which are somewhat actionable, but the actual content is more descriptive than executable. The templates are fill-in-the-blank rather than concrete executable examples, and the AI tool usage section is quite surface-level ('paste Quick Feature Spec as initial prompt'). | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Both workflows have clear checklists with explicit progress tracking. The Quick Feature Spec has a well-sequenced 5-section workflow with templates for each step, and the Full Project Scope has a 7-section checklist. The sequential nature is clear and appropriate for the non-destructive nature of spec writing. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Excellent progressive disclosure structure. The SKILL.md serves as a clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to QUICK-SPEC.md and PROJECT-SCOPE.md. Content is appropriately split between the overview and detailed templates, with clear navigation signals throughout. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
- Commit
632759f
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.