Turn ideas into clear, buildable specs for AI tools or stakeholder review. Use when starting features, planning projects, or when AI keeps building the wrong thing. Creates Quick Feature Specs (10-15 min) for immediate AI builds or Full Project Scopes (1-2 hours) for budget planning and contractor estimates.
97
Quality
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
88%
2.51xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly articulates what the skill does (creates two types of specs with time estimates), when to use it (starting features, planning, AI miscommunication), and includes natural trigger terms users would actually say. The description is concise yet comprehensive, with good distinctiveness from other potential skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Turn ideas into clear, buildable specs', 'Creates Quick Feature Specs', 'Creates Full Project Scopes'. Also specifies time estimates and purposes (AI builds, budget planning, contractor estimates). | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Turn ideas into clear, buildable specs', 'Creates Quick Feature Specs', 'Full Project Scopes') AND when ('Use when starting features, planning projects, or when AI keeps building the wrong thing'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural keywords users would say: 'features', 'planning projects', 'AI keeps building the wrong thing', 'specs', 'budget planning', 'contractor estimates'. These cover common user pain points and terminology. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche focused on specification/scoping documents with distinct triggers like 'buildable specs', 'AI keeps building the wrong thing', and specific deliverable types. Unlikely to conflict with general coding or documentation skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted skill that efficiently guides spec creation with concrete templates, clear workflows, and appropriate progressive disclosure. It respects token budget while providing actionable guidance through checklists, examples, and troubleshooting tables. The two-path approach (Quick vs Full) is clearly differentiated with appropriate use cases.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is lean and efficient, using templates, checklists, and tables rather than verbose explanations. It assumes Claude understands concepts like specs, AI tools, and stakeholder review without over-explaining. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete templates, specific examples, checklists with exact steps, and copy-paste ready formats. The 'What Users Will Do' template and example are immediately usable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Both workflows have explicit checklists with clear sequencing. The Quick Feature Spec has 5 numbered sections to complete in order, and the Full Project Scope has 7 required sections with a progress checklist. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Excellent structure with overview in main file and clear one-level-deep references to QUICK-SPEC.md and PROJECT-SCOPE.md for complete templates. Navigation is well-signaled with 'See: [file]' patterns. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
6213d1a
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.