Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body with executable examples and a clear verified workflow, appropriately offloading extended examples to a single real reference file. Minor opportunities exist to tighten speculative sections and move the merge-commit example into the reference.
Suggestions
Move the long 'gh pr create' merge-commit heredoc into references/commit_examples.md and keep only a brief pointer inline, improving both conciseness and progressive_disclosure.
Trim or drop the 'Integration with Other Skills' section, which reads as speculative cross-skill marketing rather than commit-authoring guidance.
Add a brief feedback loop after the Verify step (e.g., 'if the message is wrong, git commit --amend and re-verify') to strengthen workflow_clarity for a destructive operation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean — tables of types/scopes and executable bash snippets with no explaining of basic git concepts — but the speculative 'Integration with Other Skills' section and the long merge-commit heredoc could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready examples covering simple and complex commits, plus a types table, scope examples, and good/bad contrast pairs — concrete guidance across common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 4-step sequence (Review → Stage → Commit → Verify) with an explicit verification step, but it lacks an explicit error-recovery/feedback loop (e.g., amend if verification reveals a problem), leaving a minor validation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized overview with a real one-level-deep reference (references/commit_examples.md, signaled twice); however the lengthy gh pr create heredoc is arguably material that belongs in that reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |