Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sequenced, highly actionable workflow with strong validation and feedback loops. The only leverage point is mild verbosity in the inline TodoWrite and summary templates, which keeps conciseness and progressive disclosure at 4 rather than 5.
Suggestions
Condense the Phase 1 TodoWrite JSON to a compact bullet list of the eight tracked items instead of the full JSON array to trim tokens.
Shorten the Phase 7 summary template to the essential fields, or note that it is a template to fill rather than reproducing the full markdown block.
Consider splitting the Beads command reference (currently the Quick Reference table plus inline commands) into a short references section so the core phase flow reads leaner.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with commands and procedural steps with almost no concept-padding, though the full TodoWrite JSON array and the markdown summary template could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready shell commands (bd create, pnpm type-check, pnpm build) and fully-specified Task-tool subagent prompts whose template variables are clearly substitutable, covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven phases are clearly sequenced with explicit quality-gate validation, a verification feedback loop (Phase 6 retry up to 3 iterations), rollback procedures, and a TodoWrite checklist — matching the explicit-validation-with-feedback-loops anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so all content is inline in one well-sectioned file with an overview and quick-reference table; good structure, but the ~300-line single-file form leaves minor organization gaps versus a cleanly split layout. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |