CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

process-logs

Process error logs from admin panel - fetch new errors, analyze, create tasks, fix, and mark resolved

58

Quality

73%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/process-logs/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A highly actionable, well-sequenced operational runbook whose main weaknesses are redundancy and monolithic structure. The same mandatory rules (Beads commands, subagent routing, auto_muted handling) are stated three times each, and a large reference table plus maintenance instructions are inlined that would be better split into a bundled reference file.

Suggestions

State each mandatory rule once: keep the full Beads create/update/close commands in one place (e.g., section 7d or the Step 2 loop) and reference it from the other sections instead of repeating the commands verbatim three times.

Move the auto-mute pattern table, the 'how to add a new auto-mute rule' instructions, and the architecture/fingerprint-trigger notes into a bundled reference file (e.g., references/auto-mute-rules.md) linked from a short 'Auto-muted errors: see references/...' pointer.

Collapse the three overlapping routing tables (section 2, Step 2 item 2, and Error Categories) into a single pattern → category → subagent → priority table.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense with domain-specific value (exact SQL, Beads commands, auto-mute rules) and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the same guidance is repeated three times over — the Beads create/update commands ("bd create --type=bug --priority=<1-3>..." in sections 1, 7d, and Step 2), the subagent routing list ("database-architect", "fullstack-nextjs-specialist" in sections 2, Step 2, and the Error Categories table), and the auto_muted skip instruction (sections 5, 6, and the Error Categories note). It is not below the midpoint: the padding is duplication rather than condescension or filler, fitting 'mostly efficient but could be tightened', though the 13-row auto-mute table is reference data inlined into the main file.

3 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable throughout: copy-paste-ready SQL for fetching, counting, and bulk-resolving logs (with correct LEFT JOIN / ON CONFLICT clauses), exact Beads CLI commands ("bd create --type=bug --priority=<1-3> --title=... --files ...", "bd close <task_id> --reason=..."), concrete Task() delegation templates per error category, and a verification checklist with explicit commands ("pnpm type-check && pnpm build"). Placeholders like <error_message> and <id> are appropriate parameterization, not pseudocode, and the common cases (DB constraint, tRPC, type errors) each get a worked example.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The multi-step process is clearly sequenced — Step 1 (fetch from both tables), Step 1.5 (environment filtering with an explicit rule: bulk-resolve only NULL/local, never dev or stage), Step 2 (a numbered per-error loop ending in DB resolution and task closure), Step 3 (summary report) — with an explicit validation feedback loop ("If errors → re-delegate") and a pre-resolution verification checklist. This is a batch operation and the required validation checkpoints are present and explicit, matching the top anchor including error-recovery loops and a checklist.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

There are no bundle files at all (no references/, scripts/, or assets/), so everything lives in one ~520-line SKILL.md with decent section headers — but content that clearly belongs in a separate reference file is inlined: the 13-row auto-mute pattern table, the "how to add a new auto-mute rule" instructions, and the architecture/fingerprint-trigger notes. The "Reference Docs" section points to repo files (e.g., ".claude/docs/admin-logs-guide.md") rather than well-signaled one-level-deep skill references, so navigation is only partially supported.

3 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A solid, concrete description that clearly communicates the five-step error-processing pipeline, weakened by a missing 'when to use' trigger clause and thin keyword coverage. Adding an explicit invocation context would lift both completeness and trigger quality.

Suggestions

Append a 'when' clause with concrete trigger phrases, e.g., 'Use when the user asks to process error logs, review /admin/logs, or says обработай логи ошибок'.

Add natural synonyms users would actually say — "log analysis", "bug reports", "production errors" — to improve trigger matching.

Mention the distinguishing mechanics (Beads task tracking, root-cause fixes) to sharpen distinctiveness against generic debugging skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists several concrete pipeline actions — "fetch new errors, analyze, create tasks, fix, and mark resolved" — which goes beyond naming the domain. It falls short of the top anchor because "analyze" and "create tasks" are generic verbs (no mention of what analysis or task tracking involves, e.g., Beads or root-cause investigation), leaving minor gaps in coverage.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear (the five-step fetch→resolve pipeline), but the 'when' is entirely absent — there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which caps this dimension at 3 per the judging guidelines. It is not a 2 because the 'what' half is concrete and multi-part rather than vague.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It includes some relevant natural keywords ("error logs", "admin panel", "fix"), but misses common variations and synonyms a user might say — "process logs", "log analysis", "bug reports", "production errors", or the Russian trigger phrase "обработай логи ошибок" that the body itself documents as the natural invocation. This matches 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms'.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Process error logs from admin panel" carves a fairly specific niche tied to a particular system (/admin/logs, error_logs table), giving it mostly distinct triggers with only minor overlap risk against generic debugging or bug-fixing skills. It is not a 5 because "fix errors" territory is broad and the description lacks a distinguishing tool name (e.g., Beads) that would make the niche airtight.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

skill_md_line_count

SKILL.md is long (524 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository

maslennikov-ig/claude-code-orchestrator-kit

Path

.claude/skills/process-logs/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.