CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

security-health-inline

Inline orchestration workflow for security vulnerability detection and remediation with Beads integration. Provides step-by-step phases for security-scanner detection, priority-based fixing with vulnerability-fixer, and verification cycles.

56

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/security-health-inline/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Security Health Check (Inline Orchestration)

You ARE the orchestrator. Execute this workflow directly without spawning a separate orchestrator agent.

Workflow Overview

Beads Init → Detection → Create Issues → Fix by Priority → Close Issues → Verify → Beads Complete

Max iterations: 3 Priorities: critical → high → medium → low Beads integration: Automatic issue tracking


Phase 1: Pre-flight & Beads Init

  1. Setup directories:

    mkdir -p .tmp/current/{plans,changes,backups}
  2. Validate environment:

    • Check package.json exists
    • Check type-check and build scripts exist
  3. Create Beads wisp:

    bd mol wisp exploration --vars "question=Security vulnerability scan"

    IMPORTANT: Save the wisp ID (e.g., mc2-xxx) for later use.

  4. Initialize TodoWrite:

    [
      {"content": "Security scan", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Scanning for vulnerabilities"},
      {"content": "Create Beads issues", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Creating issues"},
      {"content": "Fix critical vulnerabilities", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Fixing critical vulnerabilities"},
      {"content": "Fix high priority vulnerabilities", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Fixing high vulnerabilities"},
      {"content": "Fix medium priority vulnerabilities", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Fixing medium vulnerabilities"},
      {"content": "Fix low priority vulnerabilities", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Fixing low vulnerabilities"},
      {"content": "Verification scan", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Verifying fixes"},
      {"content": "Complete Beads wisp", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Completing wisp"}
    ]

Phase 2: Detection

Invoke security-scanner via Task tool:

subagent_type: "security-scanner"
description: "Detect all vulnerabilities"
prompt: |
  Scan the entire codebase for security vulnerabilities:
  - SQL injection
  - XSS vulnerabilities
  - Authentication/authorization issues
  - RLS policy violations
  - Hardcoded secrets
  - Insecure dependencies
  - Categorize by priority (critical/high/medium/low)

  Generate: security-scan-report.md

  Return summary with vulnerability counts per priority.

After security-scanner returns:

  1. Read security-scan-report.md
  2. Parse vulnerability counts by priority
  3. If zero vulnerabilities → skip to Phase 7 (Final Summary)
  4. Update TodoWrite: mark detection complete

Phase 3: Create Beads Issues

For each vulnerability found, create a Beads issue:

# Critical (P0) - Security critical gets highest priority
bd create "SECURITY: {vuln_title}" -t bug -p 0 -d "{description}" \
  --deps discovered-from:{wisp_id}

# High (P1)
bd create "SECURITY: {vuln_title}" -t bug -p 1 -d "{description}" \
  --deps discovered-from:{wisp_id}

# Medium (P2)
bd create "SECURITY: {vuln_title}" -t bug -p 2 -d "{description}" \
  --deps discovered-from:{wisp_id}

# Low (P3)
bd create "SECURITY: {vuln_title}" -t bug -p 3 -d "{description}" \
  --deps discovered-from:{wisp_id}

Add security label:

bd update {issue_id} --add-label security

Track issue IDs in a mapping for later closure.

Update TodoWrite: mark "Create Beads issues" complete.


Phase 4: Quality Gate (Pre-fix)

Run inline validation:

pnpm type-check
pnpm build
  • If both pass → proceed to fixing
  • If fail → report to user, exit

Phase 5: Fixing Loop

For each priority (critical → high → medium → low):

  1. Check if vulnerabilities exist for this priority

    • If zero → skip to next priority
  2. Update TodoWrite: mark current priority in_progress

  3. Claim issues in Beads:

    bd update {issue_id} --status in_progress
  4. Invoke vulnerability-fixer via Task tool:

    subagent_type: "vulnerability-fixer"
    description: "Fix {priority} vulnerabilities"
    prompt: |
      Read security-scan-report.md and fix all {priority} priority vulnerabilities.
    
      For each vulnerability:
      1. Backup file before editing
      2. Implement fix
      3. Log change to .tmp/current/changes/security-changes.json
    
      Generate/update: security-fixes-implemented.md
    
      Return: count of fixed vulnerabilities, count of failed fixes, list of fixed vuln IDs.
  5. Quality Gate (inline):

    pnpm type-check
    pnpm build
    • If FAIL → report error, suggest rollback, exit
    • If PASS → continue
  6. Close fixed issues in Beads:

    bd close {issue_id_1} {issue_id_2} ... --reason "Security fix applied"
  7. Update TodoWrite: mark priority complete

  8. Repeat for next priority


Phase 6: Verification

After all priorities fixed:

  1. Update TodoWrite: mark verification in_progress

  2. Invoke security-scanner (verification mode):

    subagent_type: "security-scanner"
    description: "Verification scan"
    prompt: |
      Re-scan codebase after fixes.
      Compare with previous security-scan-report.md.
    
      Report:
      - Vulnerabilities fixed (count)
      - Vulnerabilities remaining (count)
      - New vulnerabilities introduced (count)
  3. Decision:

    • If vulnerabilities_remaining == 0 → Phase 7
    • If iteration < 3 AND vulnerabilities_remaining > 0 → Go to Phase 2
    • If iteration >= 3 → Phase 7 with remaining vulnerabilities

Phase 7: Final Summary & Beads Complete

  1. Complete Beads wisp:

    # If all fixed
    bd mol squash {wisp_id}
    
    # If nothing found
    bd mol burn {wisp_id}
  2. Create issues for remaining vulnerabilities (if any):

    bd create "SECURITY REMAINING: {vuln_title}" -t bug -p {priority} \
      -d "Not fixed in scan. REQUIRES MANUAL ATTENTION. See security-scan-report.md"
    bd update {new_issue_id} --add-label security
  3. Generate summary for user:

## Security Health Check Complete

**Wisp ID**: {wisp_id}
**Iterations**: {count}/3
**Status**: {SUCCESS/PARTIAL}

### Results
- Found: {total} vulnerabilities
- Fixed: {fixed} ({percentage}%)
- Remaining: {remaining}

### By Priority
- Critical: {fixed}/{total}
- High: {fixed}/{total}
- Medium: {fixed}/{total}
- Low: {fixed}/{total}

### Beads Issues
- Created: {count}
- Closed: {count}
- Remaining: {count} (SECURITY LABEL - requires attention)

### Validation
- Type Check: {status}
- Build: {status}

### Artifacts
- Detection: `security-scan-report.md`
- Fixes: `security-fixes-implemented.md`
  1. Update TodoWrite: mark wisp complete

  2. SESSION CLOSE PROTOCOL:

    git status
    git add .
    bd sync
    git commit -m "security: {fixed} vulnerabilities fixed ({wisp_id})"
    bd sync
    git push

Error Handling

If quality gate fails:

Rollback available: .tmp/current/changes/security-changes.json

To rollback:
1. Read changes log
2. Restore files from .tmp/current/backups/
3. Re-run workflow

If worker fails:

  • Report error to user
  • Keep Beads wisp open for manual completion
  • Suggest manual intervention
  • Exit workflow

If Beads command fails:

  • Log error but continue workflow
  • Beads tracking is enhancement, not blocker

Quick Reference

PhaseBeads Action
1. Pre-flightbd mol wisp exploration
3. After detectionbd create + --add-label security
5. Before fixbd update --status in_progress
5. After fixbd close --reason "Fixed"
7. Completebd mol squash/burn
7. Remainingbd create with security label
Repository

maslennikov-ig/claude-code-orchestrator-kit

Path

.claude/skills/security-health-inline/SKILL.md

Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.