Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, highly actionable conventions reference with concrete code for common Inertia.js cases and clean section structure; its only real gap is the dangling reference to a non-existent rulebook.json.
Suggestions
Provide the referenced 'rulebook.json' (or note its location) so the INRT rule pointers resolve to real content.
If rulebook.json is intentionally external, add a one-line note on where to find it so the reference is not a dead end.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean throughout — directory layout, per-framework conventions, and shared rules each delivered as terse rules plus minimal code, with no padding explaining what Inertia, React, or Vue are, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready examples cover the common cases — 'useForm({ title: '' })', 'usePage<SharedProps>().props', '<Link href="/posts">', 'router.reload({ only: ['propName'] })', 'Inertia::defer()' — matching the 'fully executable; specific examples cover common cases' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a conventions reference rather than a multi-step workflow, but the sections are clearly organized and unambiguous with no destructive or batch operations requiring validation checkpoints; it sits above 3 for clarity but below 5 because no explicit sequenced workflow exists. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clearly separated sections and the 'Rules reference' signals a one-level-deep pointer to 'rulebook.json', but that referenced file is not present in the bundle, leaving a minor navigation gap that keeps it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |