Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, information-dense skill body: concrete code examples, exact source-file locations for every rule type, and explicit verification steps with sibling-safety checks. The main weaknesses are mild redundancy across sections, verification commands that are named rather than given verbatim, and a monolithic 120-line document where some sections could be split into reference files.
Suggestions
Give the verification steps as exact commands (e.g. the actual test-filter invocation and build command) so 'Run the narrow Factory rule tests' is copy-paste ready.
Deduplicate cross-section constraints (inheritance rules, 'do not invent replacement APIs') into a single 'Limits' section to trim tokens.
Move the built-in handler location map and the custom-board execution journey detail into a reference file, keeping SKILL.md as the overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense, constraint-driven prose with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, and every section carries deployment-specific information. Not 5 because some constraints are repeated across sections ("custom boards inherit nothing" appears twice; "Do not invent built-in replacement APIs" recurs) and the stacked 'do not' sentences could be consolidated. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides executable TypeScript snippets (PlatformGithubIntegration/LinearIntegration rules, a complete BoardTransitionPolicy example), concrete source-file paths for every handler location, and specific verification commands. Not 5 because the test/build steps ('Run the narrow Factory rule tests and package typecheck', 'Run the Web build') are not exact copy-paste invocations, and a substantial share of guidance is prohibitive rather than executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered sequences for finding the configuration (read existing rules and tests before editing), changing built-in handlers (find/read, decide on preserved behavior, use typed fields, return shape, idempotency key), and an explicit 'Verify the change' section with validation steps including testing unaffected siblings. Not 5 because there is no explicit fix-and-re-run feedback loop after validation; not 3 because checkpoints are present and explicit throughout. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into focused sections with clear headers, and repo source references (src/boards/transition-policy.ts, src/boards/work-tool-rules.ts) are clearly signaled and one level deep. Not 5 because at ~120 lines spanning six topics, sections like 'Execute a custom board' and the built-in handler location map would fit better in separate reference files; not 3 because structure and navigation are good and nothing is buried. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |