Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable, well-structured guide that assumes Claude's competence and provides explicit validation steps for a destructive/policy-changing workflow. Main improvements would be consolidating repeated prohibitions and adding executable examples to the phase-semantics section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Information-dense and assumes domain competence (no basic-concept padding), but a number of repeated 'Do not invent'/'Never' prohibitions recur across sections and could be consolidated. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete file paths, typed decision shapes, and copy-paste-ready TypeScript for the main cases (integration constructors, transitionPolicy), though a few sections like phase semantics offer file references without an executable example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Numbered discovery and handler-change sequences plus a strong explicit 'Verify the change' checklist with undefined/accepted/rejected path testing; validation is end-loaded rather than inline per edit step, so it falls just short of the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single well-sectioned SKILL.md with clear headers and no nested references; detailed API/contract material is inline rather than split into reference files, which keeps it just below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |