Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, highly actionable authoring playbook with ready-to-use templates and a full worked example, organized as a clean single file. The main gap is the absence of an explicit step-by-step authoring workflow with validation checkpoints for the builder.
Suggestions
Add a short numbered authoring workflow (e.g. 1. check archetypes → 2. pick name/description → 3. fill system-prompt template → 4. enforce required rules → 5. verify completion criteria) so the builder has an explicit, checkable sequence.
Add a validation/checkpoint step the builder runs before declaring the agent done, mirroring the completion-criteria checklist that the produced agent itself must satisfy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The playbook is lean: it assumes Claude's competence, avoids explaining what an assistant is, and every section (identity template, system-prompt template, rules, anti-patterns, worked example) earns its place without padded concept exposition. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready fill-in templates (system prompt with explicit placeholders), name/description patterns, required rules, and a complete worked example producing a concrete agent — fully executable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sections appear in a logical order, but the authoring process is not framed as a numbered sequence with validation checkpoints; the completion-criteria checklist applies to the produced agent rather than to the author's own steps. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single, well-organized SKILL.md (~85 lines) with clear section headings and no nested or broken references; no bundle files are needed at this scope, so the flat structure is appropriate and easy to navigate. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |