Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, actionable triage runbook: concrete commands, a clear comment template, a decision table, and a sequenced workflow with explicit stop conditions. It is concise and well-organized with no redundant explanation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive throughout — it assumes Claude knows what issues and labels are, uses concrete commands and a fill-in template, and avoids padded explanation, matching 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place'. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable commands (the `gh issue view … --json` call, the GraphQL query, `gh issue list --search`), a concrete comment template with literal fields, and a decision table — copy-paste ready and specific. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit checkpoints and stop conditions ('if the input cannot be resolved … stop', 'if the issue is not open, stop unless …', and the ordered label/stop checklist in step 5), satisfying the clear-sequence-with-validation anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a self-contained single-file skill with well-organized sections (label policy, output contract, severity guide, workflow) and no nested or external references, so the well-organized-sections criterion for a 3 is met. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |