Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly written, highly actionable skill body with concrete commands, an explicitly sequenced workflow, and robust validation/recovery checkpoints. Its only real weakness is mild verbosity in the error-recovery branches and no use of separate reference files for that detail.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient prose covering harness/worktrunk-specific behavior Claude would not already know, with a few wordy error-recovery branches that could be trimmed — fitting 4 rather than 5 (some over-explanation) or 3 (largely assumes competence). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands throughout — EnterWorktree({name:…}), wt -C <repo> switch --create … --format=json, git stash push -u, cd <path>, ExitWorktree({action:"keep"}) — plus concrete invocation examples covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced three-step process with explicit validation checkpoints (JSON path extraction, 'Branch already exists' detection, 'Shell cwd was reset' reachability test) and error-recovery feedback loops, matching the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single cohesive, well-sectioned document (Arguments / What to do / Cleanup / Scope) with no nested references, but at over 50 lines the under-50-lines 5-exception does not apply and the long error-recovery section could be split out, so 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |