CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

auditing-safe-harbor-checklist

Verify OpenMed de-identified output against all 18 HIPAA Safe Harbor identifier categories and report residual re-identification risk. Use when the user must confirm a note meets HIPAA Safe Harbor (45 CFR 164.514(b)(2)), needs a coverage checklist mapping detected entities to the 18 categories, wants to flag gaps like ages over 89, rare geography, fax vs phone, or biometrics, or asks whether masking was complete. Maps OpenMed CANONICAL_LABELS to the 18 HIPAA classes and uses extract_pii / deidentify to check coverage. Pairs with OpenMed deidentifying-clinical-text and auditing-deidentification-runs.

77

Quality

96%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Auditing against the HIPAA Safe Harbor checklist

The Safe Harbor method (45 CFR 164.514(b)(2)) de-identifies PHI by removing 18 specific identifier categories for the individual and their relatives, employers, and household members — and requires the covered entity to have no actual knowledge that the remainder could re-identify anyone. This skill turns that legal checklist into a concrete coverage check over OpenMed output: which of the 18 categories were detected and handled, and where the gaps are.

The full mapping table lives in references/safe-harbor-identifiers.md — all 18 categories, their OpenMed HIPAA class, the matching CANONICAL_LABELS, and per-category cautions. Read it when you need the authoritative cross-walk.

When to use this skill

Use it after a de-identification run to prove coverage, or before release to decide whether Safe Harbor is even achievable for this text. If the user needs a signed, retained record of the run, hand off to auditing-deidentification-runs.

Quick start: coverage check

import openmed
from openmed.core.labels import LABEL_TO_HIPAA, HIPAA_SAFE_HARBOR_CLASSES

note = (
    "Patient John Doe (MRN 1234567), age 92, of Smalltown, seen 2024-03-02. "
    "SSN 123-45-6789, phone 617-555-0142."
)

# 1) Detect identifiers (spans only; no rewrite).
detected = openmed.extract_pii(note)

# 2) Roll each detected span up to its HIPAA Safe Harbor class.
covered = set()
for ent in detected.entities:
    canonical = openmed.normalize_label(ent.label)        # -> CANONICAL_LABELS form
    hipaa_class = LABEL_TO_HIPAA.get(canonical)            # -> one of 18 classes
    if hipaa_class:
        covered.add(hipaa_class)

# 3) Report which of the 18 classes were touched and which weren't observed.
missing = sorted(HIPAA_SAFE_HARBOR_CLASSES - covered)
print("covered:", sorted(covered))
print("not observed in this note:", missing)

"Not observed" is not the same as "absent" — a category may simply not occur in this note, or may have been missed. That is exactly what the human review step (below) is for.

Workflow

  1. De-identify with a Safe Harbor profile: openmed.deidentify(note, policy="hipaa_safe_harbor"). This masks every identifier class by default and runs the mandatory structured-ID safety sweep.
  2. Map detected spans to the 18 classes via LABEL_TO_HIPAA (as above). Build a table of category → detected? → action taken.
  3. Walk the checklist in references/safe-harbor-identifiers.md and flag the known gaps explicitly:
    • Ages > 89 (AGE) must be aggregated to "90+"; OpenMed flags but does not auto-cap — see shifting-clinical-dates.
    • Dates keep only the year; everything else (admit/discharge/DOB) goes.
    • ZIP beyond the first 3 digits, and small-population areas → mask whole.
    • Rare geography (small towns) and rare characteristics (unusual occupation) can re-identify even when masked field-by-field.
    • Fax shares the PHONE label; biometrics and full-face photos are out of scope for text — handle in the imaging/intake pipeline.
  4. Assess residual risk. Run audit=True and read residual_risk (auditing-deidentification-runs). Non-zero projected leakage → review.
  5. Record the "no actual knowledge" judgment. A human must sign off that the remaining text cannot re-identify the individual. Automated coverage is necessary, not sufficient.

Hand-off to / from OpenMed

  • Detect / de-id: openmed.extract_pii (spans) and openmed.deidentify (rewrite) — see deidentifying-clinical-text.
  • Label mapping: openmed.CANONICAL_LABELS, openmed.normalize_label, and LABEL_TO_HIPAA / HIPAA_SAFE_HARBOR_CLASSES in openmed/core/labels.py.
  • Signed record + residual risk: auditing-deidentification-runs (audit=TrueAuditReport.residual_risk).
  • Profile choice: configuring-privacy-policies — if you must keep dates or geography, Safe Harbor fails; use Expert Determination (hipaa_expert_review_assist) or a Limited Data Set (research_limited_dataset).

Edge cases & gotchas

  • Coverage ≠ compliance. Detecting all 18 categories does not satisfy Safe Harbor on its own — the "no actual knowledge" residual-risk judgment is required and is a human decision.
  • Ages over 89 are a transformation, not a detection. Masking the digits is fine; if you keep age, aggregate to "90+". OpenMed will not cap automatically.
  • ZIP / date rules are transformations. Safe Harbor permits keeping 3-digit ZIP (population-gated) and the year — implement the truncation; do not assume detection handles it.
  • Some categories have no text label (biometrics, full-face photos). Mark them N/A for text and ensure another pipeline stage covers them.
  • Combination re-identification. Several non-identifying quasi-identifiers together (rare diagnosis + small town + outlier age) can identify someone; this is precisely why strict_no_leak exists for high-stakes data.
  • No raw PHI in the checklist output — report categories, counts, offsets, and hashes, never the underlying identifiers.

Standards & references

  • 45 CFR 164.514(b)(2) (Safe Harbor): https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-C/part-164/subpart-E/section-164.514
  • HHS de-identification guidance (incl. the 18 identifiers and "actual knowledge"): https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/special-topics/de-identification/index.html
  • Local checklist: references/safe-harbor-identifiers.md
  • OpenMed source: openmed/core/labels.py (LABEL_TO_HIPAA, HIPAA_SAFE_HARBOR_CLASSES, CANONICAL_LABELS, normalize_label).
Repository
maziyarpanahi/openmed
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.