CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

validating-us-core

Validate FHIR R4 resources and Bundles against US Core / USCDI profiles with the official HL7 FHIR validator before submitting to an EHR. Covers running validator_cli.jar (or the public validator.fhir.org), declaring meta.profile, must-support elements, common conformance gaps (missing code/category/status), and turning validator output into a FHIR OperationOutcome. Use after exporting-to-fhir / assembling-fhir-bundles to check OpenMed-produced FHIR for US Core conformance, when the user mentions US Core, USCDI, must-support, profile validation, or Epic/Cerner ingestion requirements. Pairs after.

76

Quality

94%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, highly actionable skill body with concrete commands, a conformance-gap table, and a validation feedback loop. It is slightly above the midpoint on conciseness and progressive disclosure due to minor orientation prose and the lack of any file-split disclosure.

Suggestions

Tighten the opening paragraph and the 'Must-support means...' sentence to reduce orientation prose that restates domain concepts.

Consider extracting the conformance-gap table or OperationOutcome bridge detail into a referenced reference file to give the overview a cleaner one-level-deep progressive-disclosure structure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient and domain-specific rather than explaining basics Claude already knows, but the orientation intro and the 'Must-support means the producer must populate...' restatement could be trimmed slightly.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready curl and java -jar commands with flags, a concrete meta.profile JSON example, and a Python snippet for the OperationOutcome bridge — covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The 6-step workflow is clearly sequenced with an explicit validate→read issues→fix→re-validate feedback loop and error-vs-warning triage, including CI wiring on synthetic fixtures.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the body is well-organized into clear sections with no content that clearly belongs in a separate file, but it is a single monolithic document with no one-level-deep reference structure to navigate.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that concretely names the capability, the tooling, and the trigger conditions with synonym coverage. It clearly answers both 'what' and 'when' with minimal padding.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — running validator_cli.jar, declaring meta.profile, handling must-support, fixing conformance gaps, producing an OperationOutcome — giving comprehensive coverage rather than vague language.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly states both what it does ('Validate FHIR R4 resources and Bundles against US Core / USCDI profiles') and when to use it ('Use after exporting-to-fhir / assembling-fhir-bundles... when the user mentions...').

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural trigger phrases users would actually say — 'US Core', 'USCDI', 'must-support', 'profile validation', 'Epic/Cerner ingestion requirements' — with synonym coverage.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (US Core conformance validation) distinct from the sibling exporting/assembling skills it references, with triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
maziyarpanahi/openmed
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.