Conciseness

The 32-line body explains nothing Claude already knows; every line instructs, and the only explanatory note ("OpenCode TUI renders text verbatim") is non-obvious environment knowledge that earns its tokens, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor.

Actionability

Guidance is mostly executable: a concrete call template ("Call `search_memories` once" with filters={"AND": [{"user_id": "<id>"}, {"app_id": "<pid>"}]}, top_k=10) and an exact output block format. It falls short of fully copy-paste ready because the search query itself is left as "a focused question" and the sourcing of the <id>/<pid> placeholder values is never specified.

Workflow Clarity

The 4-step sequence (extract topics → call search_memories → output context block → silent on zero results) is clearly ordered with a decision checkpoint ("If zero results: output nothing"). It stays below the top anchor because there is no handling for a failed or errored search call and the placeholder-sourcing gap leaves a minor validation gap; the destructive/batch cap does not apply since the skill is read-only.

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references, and its content is well-organized into clear sections (Steps, Constraints, Output formatting), meeting the rubric's simple-skill exception for a top score.

Specificity

The description names a clear domain ("memories from earlier OpenCode sessions in this repository") but only one concrete action ("Search memories"); the remainder ("avoid repeating file reads, searches, or experiments") is rationale rather than capability, matching the 1-2-concrete-actions anchor rather than the several-actions anchor above.

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what ("Search memories from earlier OpenCode sessions in this repository") and when ("Use it when earlier work may already explain the code, error, decision, or command you need") with concrete trigger phrases, matching the top anchor; it is not anchor 4 because the when-clause is fully explicit, not merely present.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural trigger phrases are enumerated ("earlier work may already explain the code, error, decision, or command you need"), giving good keyword coverage a user would naturally say, but common synonyms and variations ("previous sessions", "recall", "history", "remember") are missing, so it falls between the good-coverage and comprehensive anchors.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It carves a clear niche (session-memory recall scoped to OpenCode sessions in a repository) with distinct triggers, but retains minor overlap risk with generic memory/recall skills, fitting the "mostly distinct; minor overlap risk" anchor better than the minimal-conflict anchor above.