Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, actionable, well-sequenced workflow with concrete tool calls covering the main cases and a useful output-formatting caveat. The main weakness is a minor parameter-name inconsistency in the unpin code that slightly dents copy-paste reliability.
Suggestions
Make the update_memory parameter name consistent: Step 3 uses update_memory(id=...) while Unpin uses update_memory(memory_id=...); pick one and use it in both places.
Show the full get_memory call signature (e.g., get_memory(id=<id>)) in Step 1 and Step 2 / Unpin instead of the abstract "Call get_memory with the ID".
Add a brief verify/retry note for the new-memory flow (e.g., if get_event_status has no memory ID yet, poll once more) to push workflow clarity toward a 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and action-focused with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every section (find, read, pin, new-memory, confirm, unpin, output formatting) earns its place, and the OpenCode TUI rendering note is genuinely non-obvious guidance. Not below 5 because the few framing lines (intro, the update_memory mechanism note) are minimal and load-bearing. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready calls appear throughout (search_memories with exact filter syntax and top_k, add_memory with full params, the pin text snippet), covering the common cases; held at 4 rather than 5 by minor gaps such as the inconsistent parameter name (update_memory uses id in Step 3 but memory_id in Unpin) and abstract get_memory calls without full signatures. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-4 give a clear find/read/pin/confirm sequence with a confirm checkpoint and a retrieve-event-id-then-confirm checkpoint for new memories; not a 5 because there is no explicit validate/fix/retry feedback loop, though pinning is non-destructive so the destructive-batch cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the single-purpose skill is well-organized into clearly labeled sections (Execution steps, Unpin, Output formatting) with easy navigation, satisfying the simple-skill exception for well-structured content without external references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |