Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable instruction skill with an exact tool call, a classification table, and a precise output template. Its only gaps are minor: unhandled FAILED event status, no retry path, and a little rationale text that could be trimmed.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and dense — a compact classification table, exact call parameters, and a precise output template — but contains minor trimmable explanation, such as the rationale sentences for `infer=False`/`confidence=1.0` and the description of how OpenCode TUI renders markdown verbatim. It fits "minor instances of over-explanation" better than "every token earns its place." | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The guidance is fully executable: the exact `add_memory` call with parameter names and values, a content-signal classification table, exact fallback behavior for event status, and a literal output template with a truncation rule. Nothing is pseudocode or vague. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–4 (extract → classify → store → confirm) are clearly sequenced with an explicit status checkpoint and a PENDING fallback, which anchors it above 3. However, no handling is specified for a FAILED event status and there is no retry/poll path, so it falls short of anchor 5's feedback loops for error recovery. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a short (~57 line), single-purpose skill with no external files referenced or needed; the sections (Execution, Output formatting) are well-organized and nothing that belongs in a separate file is inlined. Per the simple-skill guidance, well-organized sections suffice for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |