Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with concrete tool calls and a clear, validated workflow, though it is dense and keeps all reference-worthy material inline. Splitting the category mapping and display templates into bundle files would improve progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Move the platform-category-to-display-name mapping table and the display-format mockups into a references file (e.g. references/formatting.md) and link to it one level deep to reduce SKILL.md length.
Trim the inline output mockups to minimal structural examples, since Claude can infer exact column alignment from a compact template.
Extract the cross-project and peek-mode branches into a separate reference doc, keeping only the primary single-project tour inline for the common path.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and dense with specifics, but the long inline format mockups and category mapping table add length that could be tightened; it slightly over-specifies display templates Claude could infer. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready tool calls with exact filters and parameters, plus explicit display formats and category mapping, leaving no ambiguity about what to execute. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step process is clearly sequenced (Steps 1–6) with parallel calls specified, merge/dedup instructions, and explicit empty-state handling; the cross-project and peek modes are cleanly branched. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into sections, but all detail lives inline in SKILL.md with no bundle files or one-level-deep references to offload the category map, format templates, or cross-project logic. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |