Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a lean, actionable instruction for a single tool call, scoring well across all dimensions with no wasted tokens or missing validation. The only improvement space is adding a one-line example of the tool call with arguments.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence, naming the tool and each argument's default in tight sentences; the one mild over-explanation ("a category is a best-effort label Mem0 assigned...") is justifiable as it supports the retry advice, leaving only minor trim opportunities. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable guidance — "Call `search_memories` with the user's question" plus per-argument handling (omit top_k, scope variants, run_id filtering) — but stops short of an example call syntax, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A simple single-task skill whose single action (call search_memories, route flags as tool args) is unambiguous; the operation is read-only so no validation checkpoint is required, satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external references needed and no bundle files present; the single titled section is well-organized for a simple skill, meeting the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |