Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, actionable skill body with concrete tool calls, display templates, and clear branching across modes. The main improvement areas are minor: tightening repeated display blocks and adding light validation/edge-case checkpoints where useful.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated display-format code blocks (cross-project vs. single-project) into a shared template to reduce redundancy.
Add a brief verification note for the >10-entry truncation and empty-state paths so the workflow has an explicit checkpoint.
Consider moving the category-to-display-name mapping table into a reference file to keep the core tour flow front and center.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with concrete tool calls and display templates and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, though the repeated display-format blocks across modes could be tightened slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides exact tool invocations (e.g., `mem0_memory` with `action="get_all"`, `scope="global"`), a concrete category-mapping table, and copy-ready display templates covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–5 are clearly sequenced with edge-case handling (empty state, >10-entry truncation), and the operation is read-only so destructive-validation caps do not apply, but no explicit validation checkpoints are present. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clearly signaled sections (Cross-project mode, Search mode, Execution) in a self-contained SKILL.md with no nested references, though at ~85 lines some material (e.g., the category table) could justify a reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |