CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

act-365

Act! 365 integration. Manage Contacts, Groups, Opportunities, Tasks, Users. Use when the user wants to interact with Act! 365 data.

Quality

75%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/act-365/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body delivers highly actionable, executable CLI guidance with a well-sequenced connection workflow including explicit state handling. Its weaknesses are token waste in the "No description" actions table and product intro, plus broken step references (a "Step 2" that doesn't exist) that undermine navigation of the workflow.

Suggestions

Fix the broken navigation: "skip to Step 2" references a step that is never defined — either number the sections (Step 1: Connect, Step 2: Search and run actions) or replace the references with explicit section names.

Trim the 18-row Popular actions table whose Description column is entirely "No description" — either drop the column, source real action descriptions from `membrane action list`, or move the full catalog to a references file with only a handful of representative examples inline.

Remove the vague "Agent Types : claude, openclaw, codex, warp, windsurf, etc." line and the marketing-style product introduction paragraph, keeping only operational guidance Claude cannot infer.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly command-focused and efficient, but the 18-row "Popular actions" table where every Description cell reads "No description" is pure filler, and the marketing-style product intro plus the vague "Agent Types : claude, openclaw, codex, warp, windsurf, etc." line add unnecessary tokens, matching anchor 3.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, copy-paste-ready bash commands cover installation, login, connection setup, action search, action run with JSON input, and proxying, with a complete flag table. Minor gaps — dangling references to a nonexistent "Step 2" and inconsistent use of `npx @membranehq/cli` vs `membrane` — keep it below anchor 5.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The install → login → connection ensure → poll → action list → action run sequence is clear with explicit state checkpoints (READY, CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED with re-poll instructions, CONFIGURATION_ERROR/SETUP_FAILED handling). However, "skip to Step 2" points to a step that does not exist and section numbering (a "1b" with no visible Step 1/2 labels) is incoherent, matching anchor 4's minor validation gaps.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The single file (~160 lines, no bundle files present) is well-organized with clear section headers covering setup, connection, actions, proxying, and best practices. The bulk actions table is reference data inlined rather than split out, but it is modest in size, fitting anchor 4's "minor organization gaps".

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is a solid, concise two-part statement: a clear what with named CRM entities and an explicit Use-when trigger anchored to the product name. Its main weaknesses are the generic verb "Manage" and a when-clause that merely restates the domain rather than naming concrete user scenarios.

Suggestions

Replace the generic verb "Manage" with distinct concrete actions per entity, e.g. "Create, update, and list Contacts, Companies, Opportunities, Tasks, and Notes in Act! 365".

Expand the when-clause with concrete trigger scenarios users would actually say, e.g. "Use when the user mentions Act! 365, wants to manage CRM contacts, track sales opportunities, or work with Act! tasks and notes".

Consider adding natural synonyms like "CRM", "deals", or "companies" to broaden natural-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Manage Contacts, Groups, Opportunities, Tasks, Users" names the domain and five concrete objects, but the single generic verb "Manage" provides no distinct concrete actions, matching anchor 3 rather than anchor 4's multiple specific action verbs.

3 / 5

Completeness

Both what ("Manage Contacts, Groups, Opportunities, Tasks, Users") and when ("Use when the user wants to interact with Act! 365 data") are explicitly present, but the when-clause is circular and could name concrete trigger scenarios, matching anchor 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural entity terms ("Contacts, Groups, Opportunities, Tasks, Users", "Act! 365") give good keyword coverage, though common variations like "CRM", "companies", or "deals" are missing, placing it just below anchor 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Act! 365" names a specific niche product with entity-level triggers (contacts, opportunities, groups), giving it a clear niche with minimal conflict risk against other skills, matching anchor 5.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

membranedev/application-skills

Path

skills/act-365/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.