Name: airtable
Rating: 53.6 (1 reviews)
Author: membranedev

airtable

Airtable integration. Manage project management data, records, and workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Airtable data.

Quality

60%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/airtable/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill is highly actionable with concrete commands and a clear connection workflow, but it carries unnecessary conceptual filler, inlines API-reference material that belongs in a bundled file, and lacks validation steps for its destructive/batch record operations.

Suggestions

Add an explicit validation/feedback step before destructive batch actions (e.g. list-records to preview, then confirm, then delete-records with a re-list to verify).

Move the "Popular actions" table into a bundled references/ file and link to it from the body to improve progressive disclosure.

Trim the introductory "Airtable is a low-code platform... spreadsheet on steroids" paragraph and the filler "When to use which actions" line.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly commands and tables, but the opening "Airtable is a low-code platform... spreadsheet on steroids" paragraph explains a concept Claude already knows and "When to use which actions: Use action names and parameters as needed" is filler, matching the anchor for mostly-efficient content with some unnecessary explanation.	3 / 5
Actionability	Provides concrete, copy-pasteable bash commands (membrane connection ensure, action run, request) plus flag tables and a popular-actions table, with only minor gaps from placeholders like <actionId> and CONNECTION_ID, fitting the anchor for mostly-executable guidance with minor gaps.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear install->login->connect->poll->search->run sequence exists with a readiness-state checkpoint, but destructive/batch operations (delete-records, update-records) appear with no validation or feedback loop, so the batch/destructive cap of 3 applies per the rubric.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The file is well-sectioned with clear headers and no nested references, but the inlined "Popular actions" API-reference table is content that would be better split into a separate reference file, matching the anchor for some structure with inline content that should be separate.	3 / 5
	Total	13 / 20 Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is solid and complete, naming a distinct product niche with an explicit "Use when" trigger. Its main weakness is generic action verbs and lack of concrete trigger-term variations that would push specificity and trigger quality higher.

Suggestions

Replace the generic verb "Manage" with concrete operations, e.g. "Create, update, list, and delete Airtable records and bases".

Expand trigger terms to natural user phrasings like "Airtable bases, tables, records, or when the user mentions Airtable".

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the Airtable domain and a few actions ("Manage project management data, records, and workflows") but the verbs are generic ("manage") rather than concrete operations like create/update/list/delete, fitting the anchor that lists 1-2 actions without being comprehensive.	3 / 5
Completeness	Answers both "what" (manage data, records, workflows) and "when" (Use when the user wants to interact with Airtable data), but the "when" is generic rather than concrete trigger phrases, fitting the anchor where both are present but "when" could be more explicit.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes "Airtable" and a "Use when the user wants to interact with Airtable data" trigger, but lacks natural synonym variations users actually say (e.g. "Airtable base", "Airtable table", "Airtable records"), matching the anchor for some relevant keywords with missing variations.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The named "Airtable integration" niche is clearly distinct from most skills with only minor overlap risk against a generic project-management skill, but the generic "project management" framing keeps it from a 5.	4 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: membranedev/application-skills
Path: skills/airtable/SKILL.md
Commit: f484c82

Reviewed: 3 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.