Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers genuinely actionable CLI guidance with a solid connection-readiness loop, but it is undermined by a broken 'Step 2' cross-reference, a no-value actions table, and no verification guidance for write operations. Tightening the intro, moving the action catalog to a reference file, and adding one worked example would lift most dimensions.
Suggestions
Fix the dangling 'skip to Step 2' reference by adding explicit step headings (or removing the numbering), and add a verification checkpoint for write actions (e.g. re-fetch the created/updated record with get-invoice/get-contact to confirm the result).
Drop or populate the 'No description' column in the Popular actions table — either give each action a one-line purpose or move the full catalog to a references/ file and keep 5-6 highlighted actions inline.
Add one end-to-end worked example that chains the placeholders together, e.g. membrane connection ensure → action list --intent "list recent invoices" → action run list-invoices --input '{"limit": 10}' and shows where the connection id comes from.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly commands and tables, but it pads tokens with a conceptual intro ("Alegra is a cloud-based accounting and invoicing software designed for small businesses...") and a 20-row 'Popular actions' table where the Description column reads "No description" on every single row — dead weight. This matches anchor 3 ("Mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened") rather than 4, since the dead table column and intro are clearly trimmable. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable throughout: install and login commands, 'connection ensure' with state handling, 'action list/run' with JSON input syntax, and a proxy flag table. It fits anchor 4 ("Mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps") but not 5, because the placeholders (<actionId>, CONNECTION_ID) are never assembled into one worked end-to-end example showing a real query and its output. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence (install → login → connect → poll → search → run) is present with a good polling feedback loop for connection states, but it instructs readers to 'skip to Step 2' when no Step 2 is labeled anywhere, and create/update operations have no verification checkpoint before or after. This matches anchor 3 ("Steps listed but validation gaps; sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit") — not 2, because the sequence and state-handling are otherwise well defined. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single ~160-line file with well-labeled sections but no bundle files at all, and bulk catalog content — the 20-row action table and the proxy option table — is inlined rather than split into a reference file. This matches anchor 3 ("Some structure but could be better organized... content that should be separate is inline") rather than 4, which expects the bulk of detail placed in separate files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |