Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers strong executable CLI guidance — connection lifecycle, action discovery, execution, and proxy fallback are all command-backed. Its weaknesses are the empty overview filler, a dangling 'Step 2' reference, unvalidated state-changing operations, and an ambiguous actionId-vs-key mismatch between the catalog table and the run command. Tightening the overview and adding verification steps for create/update operations would raise both conciseness and workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Delete the content-free 'Altoviz Overview' bullet tree and 'Use action names and parameters as needed', or replace them with the one-line purpose the first paragraph already states.
Fix the dangling 'skip to Step 2' reference by giving the connection and action-discovery sections explicit step numbers.
Clarify whether `action run` takes the table's Key value or a separate id, and add a verification step (e.g., run get-invoice after create-invoice) for state-changing operations.
Move the 20-row action catalog to a references/ file, keeping a handful of representative actions inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and command-focused, but contains unnecessary filler: the empty 'Altoviz Overview' bullet tree ('Visualization / Data / Account / Subscription'), the no-op sentence 'Use action names and parameters as needed', and a 20-row action table whose Description column reads 'No description' for every entry. Fits 'Mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened'; not 4 given several padded sections. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready CLI commands cover install, login (including headless completion), connection setup, action search, action execution with --input JSON, and proxying with a flags table. Fits 'Mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps' — the gap being that the table lists action 'Key' values while `membrane action run <actionId>` never clarifies whether to use the key or a separate id, and no fully worked end-to-end example is given. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The connection sequence is present with state polling and error-state handling (READY / CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED / CONFIGURATION_ERROR), but 'skip to **Step 2**' references a step that is never labeled, and state-changing operations (create/update invoices, customers) have no validation or verification guidance. Per the rubric cap for workflows involving state-changing operations without validation, this cannot exceed 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single-file skill is well-organized into clearly headed sections with a single logical level and no nested references. The main gap is the 20-row action catalog inlined in the body, which would sit better in a separate reference file. Fits 'Good structure; most content is appropriately placed... minor organization gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |