Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and actionable with executable commands and a real polling feedback loop for connection readiness; its main weaknesses are the absence of progressive disclosure via separate reference files and a sparse overview section.
Suggestions
Move the proxy-request flag table and action-discovery reference detail into a separate REFERENCE.md and link to it from the body to enable one-level-deep progressive disclosure.
Expand or remove the skeletal "Apaya Overview" section (Merchant/Payment Request/Customer) so every section carries substantive guidance.
Add a brief validation/checklist step after running an action (e.g. confirm the `output` field and expected shape before reporting success) to strengthen workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with executable commands and section headers; only minor explanatory prose (e.g. "so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing") could be trimmed, fitting the "efficient; minor instances of over-explanation" anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready bash commands cover install, login, connection ensure/get, action list/run, and proxy requests with a clear options table; minor gaps remain (placeholders like CONNECTION_ID and omitted sample output), keeping it just below fully comprehensive. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence (install → authenticate → connect → poll to READY → search → run) is present with an explicit connection-state feedback loop (READY/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED/CONFIGURATION_ERROR and re-poll), but there is no validation/checkpoint after running actions, a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and all content is inline in SKILL.md with reasonable section headers, but there are no one-level-deep references to split out the proxy/action reference detail, and the sparse "Apaya Overview" section shows organization gaps. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |