CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

apitemplateio

APITemplate.io integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with APITemplate.io data.

Quality

69%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/apitemplateio/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable, with executable commands, a useful actions table, a proxy fallback, and a well-handled connection polling workflow with explicit state handling. Its weaknesses are moderate padding (marketing intro, cryptic overview section), a dangling 'Step 2' reference that breaks the workflow's coherence, and absent validation guidance for the destructive/batch actions it advertises.

Suggestions

Remove the 'APITemplate.io Overview' bullet section and trim the marketing-style introduction; keep only the one-line purpose and official docs link.

Fix the workflow labeling: 'skip to Step 2' points at nothing — either number the sections (Step 1: Connect, Step 2: Find & run actions) or drop the step references.

Add validation guidance for destructive and batch operations, e.g. confirm with the user (or verify object IDs via list-objects) before running delete-object, and check output before treating a generation as successful.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient commands and tables, but includes unnecessary padding: the marketing-style intro ("It's used by marketers, developers, and businesses to create personalized visuals at scale") and the cryptic 'APITemplate.io Overview' bullet list ("Template / Image / API Request") that conveys nothing actionable. Fits anchor 3 (mostly efficient, some unnecessary explanation that could be tightened) rather than 4, where over-explanation would be only minor.

3 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands throughout: install ('npm install -g @membranehq/cli@latest'), auth ('membrane login --tenant --clientName=<agentType>'), connection ('membrane connection ensure "https://apitemplate.io/" --json'), running actions with JSON input ('membrane action run <actionId> --connectionId=CONNECTION_ID --input '{"key": "value"}' --json'), and a proxy flag table. Concrete examples cover the common cases, matching anchor 5.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A sequence is present (install → login → connection ensure → poll states → search actions → run → proxy fallback) with a real polling feedback loop for connection states (BUILDING/READY/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED/CONFIGURATION_ERROR). However, 'skip to Step 2' references a step that is never labeled anywhere, and destructive actions (Delete Object) and batch generation are offered with no validation/verification guidance — the rubric's cap for destructive/batch workflows without validation applies, so it cannot exceed 3 despite the good connection-state handling.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Good single-file structure with clear section headers (Install, Authentication, Connecting, Searching, Running, Proxy, Best practices); no bundle files exist so there are no nested or buried references, and the ~150-line body is appropriately self-contained. Minor organization gaps — the dangling 'Step 2' label and the throwaway 'Overview' section — keep it at anchor 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description has the required structure (what + explicit 'Use when' clause) and is distinct via the brand name, but the capability statement is generic — 'manage data, records, and automate workflows' could describe almost any integration — and it omits the service's actual functions (PDF/image generation from templates). Trigger coverage relies almost entirely on the brand name rather than natural task phrases.

Suggestions

Replace the generic 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows' with concrete capabilities, e.g. 'Generate PDFs and images from templates, merge PDFs, and manage generated objects in APITemplate.io'.

Add natural trigger terms users would actually say, such as 'generate PDF from a template', 'create an image from JSON data', or 'merge PDFs', rather than gating only on the brand name.

Make the 'when' clause informative beyond restating the brand — e.g. 'Use when the user mentions APITemplate.io, or wants template-based PDF/image generation.'

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ("APITemplate.io integration") but the stated actions — "Manage data, records, and automate workflows" — are generic and omit the service's concrete capabilities (PDF/image generation, template management). It matches anchor 2 (names the domain, minimal or generic actions) rather than 3, which requires at least 1-2 genuinely concrete actions.

2 / 5

Completeness

Both a 'what' ("Manage data, records, and automate workflows") and an explicit 'Use when...' clause are present, so anchor 3 (which requires 'when' missing or weakly implied) does not fit. Anchor 4 fits: the 'when' clause ("when the user wants to interact with APITemplate.io data") is explicit but could be more specific — it is near-tautological, adding little beyond the brand name.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Relevant keywords are present ("APITemplate.io", "data", "records", "workflows") but common natural phrases users would say — "generate PDF", "create image", "template", "merge PDFs" — are missing. Fits anchor 3 (some relevant keywords, missing variations/synonyms) rather than 4, which expects good coverage of natural terms.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The brand name "APITemplate.io" gives a clear niche with minimal conflict risk against other skills, but the generic "automate workflows" phrasing creates minor overlap with general automation/workflow skills. Anchor 4 (mostly distinct, minor overlap risk) fits better than 5, whose example pairs the niche with distinct concrete triggers.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

membranedev/application-skills

Path

skills/apitemplateio/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.