CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

artilleryio

Artillery.io integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Artillery.io data.

56

Quality

65%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/artilleryio/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is an efficient, actionable CLI integration guide with a well-structured single-file layout. Its main gap is the absence of validation/verification feedback loops around the destructive-capable action-running and proxy paths.

Suggestions

Add an explicit verify step after running actions or proxying requests (e.g. inspect the `output` field, check for error states) to close the missing feedback loop for destructive/batch operations.

Include at least one concrete Artillery-specific action example with a real actionId and input payload rather than only abstract placeholders.

Consider moving the full `clientAction` object schema and proxy flags table into a reference file and linking from the overview to tighten progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is command-driven with executable CLI snippets and avoids teaching concepts at length, though minor prose (the intro paragraph, "This is the fastest way to get a connection") could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, copy-paste-ready commands cover install, auth, connect, search, run, and proxy with real flags, but the action examples use abstract placeholders (CONNECTION_ID, <actionId>) and never show a concrete Artillery-specific action.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear sequenced flow with good state-based branching for connection readiness exists, but running actions and proxying requests (which can be destructive/batch) lack any validation or verification checkpoint, capping this dimension at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized with clear section headers and no nested or buried references; for a single-file CLI guide the inline material (proxy flags table, clientAction schema) is reasonably placed with only minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description covers both what the skill does and when to use it, with a clearly named product niche. Its weakness is generic action phrasing and missing natural load-testing trigger terms, which keep specificity and trigger quality mid-range.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs with concrete load-testing actions, e.g. "Simulate user traffic, run load tests, and identify performance bottlenecks in Artillery.io."

Add natural trigger phrases users actually say, e.g. "Use when the user wants to run load tests, stress test an API, or check performance with Artillery.io."

Tighten the "when" clause beyond "interact with Artillery.io data" to reference load/performance testing specifically.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Manage data, records, and automate workflows" names the domain plus a few actions, but the actions are generic rather than concrete load-testing verbs (e.g. simulate traffic, find bottlenecks).

3 / 5

Completeness

Both a "what" (Artillery.io integration; manage data/records/workflows) and an explicit "when" ("Use when the user wants to interact with Artillery.io data") are present, though the trigger is generic.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"Artillery.io" and "interact with Artillery.io data" are relevant keywords, but natural load-testing phrases (load test, performance, stress test) and synonyms are absent.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Naming the specific product "Artillery.io" gives a clear niche with low conflict risk, but the generic "manage data, records, automate workflows" framing overlaps with sibling Membrane app-integration skills.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.