CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

azuqua

Azuqua integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Azuqua data.

Quality

65%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/azuqua/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is action-dense and provides a workable Membrane-based workflow with a well-handled connection state machine, but it is undermined by broken step cross-references, empty stub sections (Azuqua Overview, Popular actions), and a docs link pointing to Workato rather than Azuqua. Organization is serviceable but mediocre for a single-file skill.

Suggestions

Fix the broken workflow references: define the numbered steps (there is a "1b" with no "1a" and a "skip to Step 2" pointing at a nonexistent step), and add a post-run validation step (check the output field / handle errors) to close the feedback loop.

Remove or fill the empty sections: either populate "Azuqua Overview" and "Popular actions" with actual content (e.g., the top actions per connector) or delete them — the stub bullets and "Use action names and parameters as needed" line are pure padding.

Correct the "Official docs" link (https://help.workato.com/ is Workato's documentation, not Azuqua's) and consider moving the Membrane auth/proxy details into a reference file to slim the main body.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The bulk is lean, executable CLI commands, but there is real padding: the "Azuqua Overview" section is bare stub bullets (Flow / Execution / Connector / Datastore) plus the filler line "Use action names and parameters as needed", and "Popular actions" is a header that lists nothing popular. This fits anchor 3 (mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary content that could be tightened) rather than anchor 2, since the padding is limited to a few sections.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, executable commands appear throughout (npm install -g @membranehq/cli@latest, membrane connection ensure "https://azuqua.com/" --json, membrane action run <actionId> --connectionId=... --input '...' --json) with a complete proxy flag table. Anchor 4 (mostly executable, minor gaps) — not 5 because "skip to Step 2" points to a step that doesn't exist and the Popular actions section delivers no actual runnable examples.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A real sequence exists (install → login → connection ensure → poll → search → run → proxy fallback) and the connection state machine (READY / CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED with agentInstructions handling / CONFIGURATION_ERROR) is a genuine checkpoint loop, but the numbering is incoherent: "Step 2" is referenced but never defined, "1b" appears without a "1a", and there is no validation of action run results. This is anchor 3 (steps listed but checkpoints broken or implicit), below anchor 4's "clear sequence with most checkpoints present".

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

This is a single-file skill with no bundle files (no references/, scripts/, or assets/), clear section headers, and no nested references, but the ~140-line body inlines material that could be split (full Membrane auth walkthrough, proxy flag table) and contains empty stub sections that hurt navigation. Anchor 3 (some structure but could be better organized) rather than anchor 4.

3 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description correctly answers both what the skill does and when to use it, in third person with an explicit Use-when clause. Its weakness is generic action language ("manage data, records") and thin trigger coverage beyond the Azuqua brand name itself.

Suggestions

Replace the generic "Manage data, records, and automate workflows" with concrete Azuqua-specific operations, e.g. "Create and run Flows, monitor executions, manage Connectors and Datastores, and search/run Azuqua actions".

Expand the when-clause with natural trigger phrases and synonyms users would actually say, e.g. "Use when the user mentions Azuqua, Azuqua Flows/Flos, connectors, or wants to automate workflows or integrate SaaS apps through Azuqua".

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ("Azuqua integration") but its actions — "Manage data, records, and automate workflows" — are generic, echoing the bad example "Processes data" rather than concrete operations like creating flows, running executions, or querying datastores. This matches anchor 2 (domain named, actions minimal or generic) and falls short of anchor 3, which requires at least 1-2 concrete actions.

2 / 5

Completeness

Both halves are explicit: the what ("Azuqua integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows.") and the when ("Use when the user wants to interact with Azuqua data."). The when clause is present but circular and could be more specific, which is precisely anchor 4; anchor 5 requires concrete trigger phrases beyond restating the product name.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"Azuqua" is the natural trigger term and "data", "records", "automate workflows" add some relevance, but common variations and synonyms users might say (flows/Flos, connectors, integrations, no-code automation) are missing. This is anchor 3 (some relevant keywords, missing common variations) rather than anchor 4's good keyword coverage.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Azuqua" anchors a clear niche with minimal conflict risk, but distinctiveness rests almost entirely on the brand name — the rest of the text ("Manage data... automate workflows") would overlap with any SaaS-integration or automation skill. This is anchor 4 (mostly distinct, minor overlap risk) rather than anchor 5's clear distinct triggers.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

membranedev/application-skills

Path

skills/azuqua/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.