Name: benchmark-email
Rating: 57.599999999999994 (1 reviews)
Author: membranedev

benchmark-email

Benchmark Email integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Benchmark Email data.

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/benchmark-email/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with executable Membrane CLI commands and a clear connection-state workflow. It loses points mainly on conciseness due to a padded intro paragraph and lacks explicit post-action validation steps.

Suggestions

Trim the opening paragraph ('Benchmark Email is an email marketing platform that helps businesses...') to a one-line purpose statement.

Add an explicit validation/check step after running actions, e.g. inspect the response 'output' field and confirm success before reporting back to the user.

Remove the motivational 'so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing' phrasing in favor of a direct statement of what Membrane handles.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly efficient with concrete commands and tables, but the opening marketing-style paragraph and the 'Membrane handles authentication... so you can focus on the integration logic' line add unnecessary explanation Claude does not need.	3 / 5
Actionability	It provides copy-paste ready, fully executable commands for login, connection setup, action search, action execution, and proxy requests, each with flags and --json examples covering the common cases.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	There is a clear install -> authenticate -> connect -> search -> run sequence with a state-machine feedback loop (READY/BUILDING/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED) for polling, though post-action verification guidance is only implicit.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The single-file skill is well-organized with clear section headers and no nested references; the popular-actions table and proxy-flag table are cohesive, though the file runs over 50 lines and could optionally split the action reference.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description correctly identifies the app and includes a 'Use when' clause, satisfying basic completeness and distinctiveness. Its main weakness is generic, non-concrete action language and missing natural email-marketing trigger terms.

Suggestions

Replace 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows' with concrete capabilities, e.g. 'Create and send email campaigns, manage contact lists, and track campaign reports.'

Add natural user trigger terms such as 'email campaigns', 'contact lists', 'email marketing', or 'email automation' to the 'Use when' clause.

Make the trigger clause more specific, e.g. 'Use when the user wants to send email campaigns or manage contacts in Benchmark Email.'

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description names the domain ('Benchmark Email integration') but the actions 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows' are minimal and generic rather than concrete capabilities like campaigns or contact lists.	2 / 5
Completeness	Both a 'what' ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') and an explicit 'when' ('Use when the user wants to interact with Benchmark Email data') are present, though the trigger clause is somewhat generic.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	'Benchmark Email' is a strong natural brand trigger and 'data', 'records', 'workflows' add some relevance, but common user phrases like 'email campaigns', 'contact lists', and 'email marketing' are missing.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The explicit 'Benchmark Email' brand name makes it mostly distinct from other skills, with only minor overlap risk from the generic 'manage data and automate workflows' phrasing.	4 / 5
	Total	13 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: membranedev/application-skills
Path: skills/benchmark-email/SKILL.md
Commit: f484c82

Reviewed: 3 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.