Name: bigbox
Rating: 55.2 (1 reviews)
Author: membranedev

Blog Docs Log in Get started

bigbox

BigBox integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with BigBox data.

Quality

63%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/bigbox/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a strong, actionable integration guide with real commands and a working state-machine feedback loop for connection setup. It loses points for padded orientation prose, broken step cross-references, a monolithic structure with no reference files, and a confusing mismatch between the described BigBox (cloud storage) and the surfaced Home Depot/Best Buy product APIs.

Suggestions

Trim the orienting prose that explains concepts Claude already knows (the Dropbox/Google Drive comparison and 'central repository' analogy) to lift conciseness.

Fix the broken workflow numbering: either label the steps 1/2 explicitly or remove the dangling 'skip to Step 2' and '1b' references so the sequence is internally consistent.

Split the connection state-machine details and the actions catalog into reference files (e.g. CONNECTION_STATES.md, ACTIONS.md) and link to them from SKILL.md to enable progressive disclosure.

Reconcile the BigBox identity: the description says cloud storage while the action table and official-docs URL point to Home Depot/Best Buy product APIs — pick one and make the body consistent.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly command-and-table driven and efficient, but it includes unnecessary orientation Claude does not need ('BigBox is a cloud storage and file sharing service, similar to Dropbox or Google Drive... Think of it as a central repository') and padded asides ('so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing'). This matches the 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation' anchor rather than 4's tighter form.	3 / 5
Actionability	It provides many concrete, copy-pasteable commands (install, login, connection ensure/get, action list/run, request) with flags and JSON examples plus a populated actions table, fitting the 'mostly executable guidance; minor gaps' anchor. It does not reach 5 because several commands use unsubstituted placeholders (CONNECTION_ID, <actionId>, <id>) and the contradictory BigBox-vs-Home Depot framing leaves the actual target ambiguous.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The install→authenticate→connect→search→run sequence is present with a genuine feedback loop (poll BUILDING, handle CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED/CONFIGURATION_ERROR, re-poll), matching 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present'. It does not reach 5 because the body references 'Step 2' and labels a section '1b' with no corresponding Step 1/2 numbering, a broken cross-reference that creates a navigation gap.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The body has clear section headers but is a single monolithic ~150-line file with no external file references at all, and content that could live in separate references (the connection state-machine detail, the actions catalog) is inlined. This matches the 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline; references not signaled' anchor rather than 4.	3 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is functional and includes an explicit 'Use when' trigger with a named product, placing it solidly above average. Its main weakness is generic action verbs and thin trigger-term coverage that keep it from the top anchors.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') with concrete operations a user would actually perform (e.g. 'Search products, retrieve reviews and category listings, and get account info').

Expand the trigger clause with natural variations users would say, e.g. 'Use when the user wants to search BigBox products, look up reviews, or retrieve Home Depot product data.'

Resolve the identity mismatch — the description frames BigBox as cloud storage while the body surfaces Home Depot/Best Buy product APIs; align the description with what the skill actually does.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	It names the domain ('BigBox integration') and three action areas ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows'), but the verbs are generic ('manage', 'automate') rather than concrete operations, matching the anchor for 1-2 named-but-not-comprehensive actions. It does not reach 4 because no specific, tangible operations are enumerated.	3 / 5
Completeness	Both 'what' ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') and 'when' ('Use when the user wants to interact with BigBox data') are explicitly present, satisfying the rubric's requirement that an explicit 'Use when' clause avoids the cap of 3. It does not reach 5 because the 'when' is a single generic trigger rather than multiple concrete trigger phrases.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	The trigger 'Use when the user wants to interact with BigBox data' surfaces 'BigBox' and 'data' as relevant keywords, but coverage is thin with no synonyms or common variations (e.g. file/product/search terms). It sits at the 'some relevant keywords but missing variations' anchor rather than 4's broader coverage.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Naming a specific product ('BigBox integration') gives it a clear, mostly-distinct niche with minimal overlap risk, fitting the 'mostly distinct; minor overlap risk' anchor. It does not reach 5 because the trigger wording ('interact with BigBox data') is generic enough to overlap conceptually with other data-access skills.	4 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: membranedev/application-skills
Path: skills/bigbox/SKILL.md
Commit: f484c82

Reviewed: ~3 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.