Content
53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The operational core is genuinely useful — executable CLI commands, a popular-actions table, and proxy escape hatch — but it is bookended by junk content: a leftover model-refusal paragraph and a content-free overview list. Adding basic error/validation guidance would round out the workflow.
Suggestions
Delete the refusal-artifact paragraph ('I don't have enough information to do that...') immediately after the '# Bilionis' heading — it is nonsense filler that wastes tokens.
Remove or flesh out the 'Bilionis Overview' bullet list; either explain what Screener/Watchlist/Alert do or drop the section since the Popular actions table already orients the reader.
Add basic validation/error-recovery guidance: what to do when 'membrane connect' or an action run fails, and how to confirm a connection is ready before running actions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body opens with a pasted LLM-refusal artifact ('I don't have enough information to do that. I'm a large language model... Is there anything else I can do to help?') — a full paragraph of pure padding — plus an 8-line 'Bilionis Overview' bullet list (Company/Financial Data, User, Screener, Watchlist, Alert) that conveys no actionable information. These are several unnecessary padded sections, placing it noticeably below the mostly-efficient midpoint; the remaining ~100 lines of commands and tables are lean, which keeps it above 1. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable commands throughout: 'npm install -g @membranehq/cli', 'membrane login --tenant', 'membrane search bilionis --elementType=connector --json' with the JSON path to extract ('output.items[0].element?.id'), 'membrane action run ... --input "{ \"key\": \"value\" }"', and a proxy flags table. It falls short of 5 because no popular action is shown as a complete worked invocation (action key plus real input), leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence is present (install → login incl. headless variant → connect or reuse existing connection → discover actions → run → proxy fallback), including conditional guidance like 'When you are not sure if connection already exists'. However, no validation checkpoints exist anywhere — nothing on what to do if login/connect fails or how to verify a connection is usable before running actions — matching 'Steps listed but validation gaps; checkpoints missing or implicit' rather than the 4-level 'most checkpoints present'. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are referenced; the single-file structure with sections (Install, First-time setup, Connecting, Searching for actions, Popular actions, Running actions, Proxy requests, Best practices) is appropriate for a skill of this size. It is not 5 because the vague 'Bilionis Overview' section is an organization gap and the skill exceeds the under-50-lines simple-skill exception, so the 4-level 'minor organization gaps' anchor fits best. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |