CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

blazemeter

Blazemeter integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Blazemeter data.

58

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/blazemeter/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with executable Membrane CLI commands and a clear connection state-machine workflow, but it is padded with introductory explanation of what Blazemeter is and has minor structural inconsistencies in its step numbering.

Suggestions

Trim the opening paragraph explaining what Blazemeter is and the 'auth plumbing' aside; Claude already knows load-testing concepts.

Fix the dangling 'skip to Step 2' reference and relabel '1b' to a consistent step numbering so the connection flow is unambiguous.

Consider moving the 20-row actions table to a references file (e.g. ACTIONS.md) and keeping only the most common actions inline to reduce token load.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient with concrete commands, but it opens by explaining what Blazemeter is and pads with lines like 'so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing' that assume less of Claude than necessary.

3 / 5

Actionability

It provides copy-paste-ready, fully executable commands for every stage (install, login, connection ensure, action list/run, request) with flags and a concrete actions table covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The connection flow is a clear sequence with a state machine (READY/BUILDING/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED/CONFIGURATION_ERROR) and a poll-retry feedback loop, but the dangling 'skip to Step 2' reference and a '1b' heading with no '1a' introduce minor gaps.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is organized into well-labeled sections with no nested references, though the 20-row actions table is inlined rather than offloaded to a reference file; structure is good with minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is distinct and includes an explicit 'Use when' clause, but its action list leans on generic phrases ('manage data, automate workflows') instead of concrete Blazemeter capabilities and omits natural trigger terms like 'load testing'.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs with concrete Blazemeter actions, e.g. 'Run and monitor load tests, retrieve test reports and session data, manage projects and workspaces.'

Add natural trigger terms users would say, such as 'load testing', 'performance testing', 'test results', or 'Blazemeter reports'.

Tighten the 'Use when' clause to reference concrete scenarios, e.g. 'Use when the user wants to run or monitor Blazemeter load tests or retrieve performance reports.'

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the Blazemeter domain but the actions ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') are generic buzzwords rather than concrete Blazemeter capabilities like running load tests or reading test reports; per the vague-fluff guideline this is penalized.

2 / 5

Completeness

Both a 'what' ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') and an explicit 'when' ('Use when the user wants to interact with Blazemeter data') are present, though the 'when' clause is generic rather than listing concrete triggers, matching the anchor for 4.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

'Blazemeter' / 'Blazemeter data' are relevant brand keywords, but the description misses the natural phrases users actually say such as 'load testing', 'performance testing', or 'test results'.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Blazemeter integration' names a clear, specific niche with a distinct brand trigger, giving minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.