CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

bloom-credit

Bloom Credit integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Bloom Credit data.

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/bloom-credit/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a strong, execution-focused CLI guide: every phase of the workflow has runnable commands, the connection state machine is well documented, and error paths are covered. The main defects are cosmetic-to-structural: a dangling 'Step 2' reference, an empty 'Popular actions' section that promises examples it doesn't deliver, and a slightly padded vendor introduction.

Suggestions

Fix the dangling "skip to Step 2" references — either label the subsequent sections as steps or rephrase to "skip to Searching for actions".

Populate 'Popular actions' with 3-5 real Bloom Credit action examples (e.g. pulling a credit report, listing applicants) so the heading delivers on its promise.

Trim the vendor-marketing introduction to one sentence and move the clientAction state-handling detail and proxy flag table into a reference file to slim the main SKILL.md.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dominated by lean, executable CLI commands and a compact options table, with only minor over-explanation such as the vendor intro ("It's used by businesses that need to pull credit reports... Essentially, it provides the infrastructure for credit-related decisions") and the Membrane auth pitch. These could be trimmed, but the bulk is efficient, matching anchor 4 rather than anchor 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, copy-paste-ready commands are given for every stage (install, login, headless completion, connection ensure, polling, action list/run, proxy requests) plus a flag table. It falls short of anchor 5 because the 'Popular actions' section contains no actual Bloom Credit action examples (only a discovery command) and no worked example of pulling a credit report or score.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The sequence install → login → connection ensure → poll for READY → handle CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED/CONFIGURATION_ERROR → search actions → run/proxy is clear and includes a genuine feedback loop (poll again after user completes the action). Minor gaps remain: the document twice says "skip to Step 2" but no Step 2 section exists, and outputs are never validated (e.g. checking the response for errors), so it does not reach anchor 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A single well-organized file with clear section headers (Install, Authentication, Connecting, Searching, Running, Proxy, Best practices) and no bundle files or nested references; navigation is easy and one level deep. It stops short of anchor 5 because at ~146 lines some content (e.g. the full clientAction state machine and proxy flag reference) would sit better in a reference file for a skill of this size.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

48%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description correctly anchors on the distinctive Bloom Credit brand and includes an explicit 'Use when' clause, but the capability statement is generic marketing-style language ('manage data, records, and automate workflows') rather than the concrete credit-domain operations the skill actually supports. Trigger coverage relies almost entirely on the brand name with no natural synonyms.

Suggestions

Replace 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows' with concrete capabilities, e.g. 'Pull credit reports, retrieve credit scores, manage applicants and consents via the Bloom Credit API'.

Broaden trigger terms beyond the brand name to natural phrases like 'credit report', 'credit score', 'credit check', or 'Bloom Credit API'.

Make the 'what' and 'when' equally explicit so the description reads like the rubric's good example: concrete actions followed by 'Use when the user mentions credit reports, credit scores, or Bloom Credit'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Manage data, records, and automate workflows" names the Bloom Credit domain but the actions are generic buzzphrases with no concrete operations (no mention of credit reports, credit scores, applicants, or consents, all of which the skill body shows exist). This matches anchor 2 ('names the domain but actions are minimal or generic'); it does not reach anchor 3 because no concrete, specific action is listed.

2 / 5

Completeness

The 'when' is explicit ("Use when the user wants to interact with Bloom Credit data") but the 'what' is vague ("Manage data, records, and automate workflows"), so the description only weakly answers what the skill does. It sits between anchor 3 (clear what, weak when — here inverted) and anchor 4 (both present, one improvable), and the generic 'what' keeps it noticeably below a solid 4.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Triggers are limited to "Bloom Credit" and the generic "data"; there are no natural variations or synonyms a user might say ("credit report", "credit score", "credit check", "applicant", "Bloom Credit API"). Some relevant keywords exist but common variations are missing, matching anchor 3; it is not anchor 4 because keyword coverage is thin beyond the brand name.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Bloom Credit" is a clear niche brand, so the skill is unlikely to trigger for unrelated skills; however "Manage data, records, and automate workflows" overlaps with generic data-management skills, giving minor overlap risk. This is mostly distinct (anchor 4) rather than fully distinct (anchor 5), whose example pairs distinct triggers with concrete, specific actions.

4 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

membranedev/application-skills

Path

skills/bloom-credit/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.