Conciseness

The body is mostly command-dense and efficient, but includes removable redundancy: the "Popular actions" section repeats the action-list command already shown, "Use action names and parameters as needed." is filler, and `membrane` and `npx @membranehq/cli` invocations are used interchangeably without explanation. Fits 'Mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened'; not 4 because of the duplicated empty section and inconsistent CLI forms.

Actionability

Concrete executable commands cover the common cases: install, login with a headless `login complete <code>` branch, `connection ensure`, state polling with `--wait`, `action run` with `--input` JSON, and a proxy flag table. Fits 'Mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps'; not 5 because `membrane login --tenant --clientName=<agentType>` leaves the --tenant value unspecified and "Popular actions" promises examples but lists none.

Workflow Clarity

The install → auth → connect → search → run → proxy sequence is present with real checkpoints (poll until READY, handle CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED via clientAction fields, check error on CONFIGURATION_ERROR). Fits 'Steps listed but validation gaps; sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit'; not 4 because "skip to Step 2" references a nonexistent Step 2 and a "1b" header appears with no 1a or numbering, undermining sequence coherence.

Progressive Disclosure

A single ~140-line file with section headers and a reasonable overview-first layout, but no bundle files and organizational gaps: an empty "Popular actions" section, incoherent step numbering, and the inline clientAction state-machine detail that would sit better in a reference file. Fits 'Some structure but could be better organized'; not 4 because the header structure is internally inconsistent and some inline content (connection-state handling) is a candidate for a separate reference.

Specificity

"Manage data, records, and automate workflows" names the Brass domain but the actions are generic — no concrete capabilities like expense tracking or budgeting are stated. Fits the anchor 'Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic'; not 3 because no concrete action is enumerated, not 1 because the domain is explicitly named.

Completeness

Both parts are present: a (weak) what ("Manage data, records, and automate workflows") and an explicit when ("Use when the user wants to interact with Brass data"). Fits 'Has both what and when; when could be more explicit or specific'; not 5 because the what lacks concrete capabilities and the when is narrow, not 3 because the Use-when clause is explicit.

Trigger Term Quality

"Brass" and "Brass data" are relevant natural keywords, but the phrases finance users would actually say (expenses, spend, budget, cash flow) are entirely missing. Fits 'Some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms'; not 2 since Brass is a specific natural keyword, not 4 since the most common user phrasings are absent.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The description is gated on the distinct app name Brass ("interact with Brass data"), giving minimal conflict risk, but the generic "automate workflows" phrase could overlap with workflow-automation skills. Fits 'Mostly distinct; minor overlap risk with closely related skills'; not 5 because the generic workflow phrasing is not fully fenced off.